How is it that we view IC and ID?

--To my understanding, Intelligent design is a bit opinionated at its
best. Can an organism only be seen as intelligently designed if not by
opinion? It follows the argument of Irreducible complexity in its own
fashion. Irreducible complexity is pined down with ease if taken to
high degrees of specificity, it is only valid through plausibility,
not possibility.--In contrast abiogenesis is only valid through possibility, not
plausibility. If you may have perfection in environmental conditions
and specific chemical reactions in its own complex fluctuating manner,
abiogenesis is seen as obviously possible, but it is readily
discredited as plausible unless given massive amounts of time and
space, then any mathematical probability can be deafened to the limits
of your own imaginative scenario.--Irreducible complexity is valid if seen though a feature of
probability or plausibility, like shown through the former, it is
simply opinionated to their own degrees. Might anyone share relatively
a similar observation within this question?--Sorry my syntax seemingly is a bit cumbersome here, trying to put
what is running through my mind into words.[Edited because I can't read monolithic paragraphs. --Percy]------------------

​

[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 04-20-2002]

​

[This message has been edited by Percipient, 04-21-2002]