Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Mueller Report On-Line and Downloadable
JonF
Member (Idle past 168 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 12 of 43 (867756)
12-02-2019 5:55 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Faith
12-02-2019 5:00 PM


Re: the conclusion
Insufficient evidence to charge is not exoneration. Not allowed to charge slam-dunk cases because of administrative policy is not exoneration.
I note you cannot address the substance of the replies, just vomiting up the same bushwah. Oh, well, that's what we expect from Trumpistas.
Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Faith, posted 12-02-2019 5:00 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Admin, posted 12-02-2019 8:30 PM JonF has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 168 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 13 of 43 (867757)
12-02-2019 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by PaulK
12-02-2019 5:22 PM


Re: the conclusion
House needed a really strong case to get past the Senate.
No case could be strong enough to pass Moscow Mitch and Leningrad Lindsey.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by PaulK, posted 12-02-2019 5:22 PM PaulK has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 168 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 17 of 43 (867762)
12-02-2019 6:48 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Faith
12-02-2019 6:21 PM


Re: the conclusion
No changes. Not indicted is no exonerated.
There's overwhelming evidence for Trump's real transgressions. No dreaming required.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Faith, posted 12-02-2019 6:21 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Faith, posted 12-02-2019 7:33 PM JonF has replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 168 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


(1)
Message 30 of 43 (867789)
12-03-2019 9:23 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by Faith
12-02-2019 7:33 PM


Re: the conclusion
Trump was not indicted solely because of a DOJ administrative opinion. If it were only a question of breaking the law he would have been indicted for multiple crimes.
That is, he got off on a technicality. He's guilty.
That's not exoneration in law or in public opinion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Faith, posted 12-02-2019 7:33 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024