|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Testing The Christian Apologists | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18262 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
jar writes: You and I could meet the same person and come up with two different books describing how that character impacted our world view. Take Andrew Jackson. He is described in different ways by those who knew or claimed to know him or of him. Their conclusions were based in some way to their initial ideology and world view to begin with. Different gods serve different purposes to the devotees who describe them. This does not negate the idea that it may be only One (the same One) who has at that point in time impacted their life in any meaningful way. If each of the writers did meet God and did describe the God they met then the author of Genesis 1 met an entirely different God then the author of Genesis 2&3 or the author of Exodus. While I dont think that OT authors actually met God the way that we can in todays post resurrection world, but even that is open to argumentation.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
As the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom, so the denial of God is the height of foolishness.? R.C. Sproul, Essential Truths of the Christian Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GDR Member Posts: 6202 From: Sidney, BC, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 1.9
|
TGP writes: I probably shouldn’t insert myself in your conversation with jar but I will anyway. The point is that these writers actually met God in some way or fashion. They were not simply imagining him, as you might a mugwump. I suggest that you might start with the understanding that the entire Bible is written by fallible men, and that in many cases it is written from their imaginations. (There are the historical books as well where the writers have their own biases.) However, I contend that God reaches out and inspires us through our imaginations. For example we have a little guy in our church who is severely autistic and is non-verbal. His mother is a wonderful woman and when I see her holding and loving that little guy I see God in that love. In my imagination I see God loving us in the same way as she loves her autistic son. It is hardly conclusive evidence and I suppose that is where faith comes into it. I believe that the Bible can be read in one sense as a cohesive narrative. As you read through the early chapter I see a progressive understanding of the nature of God from the vengeful God that wants to destroy the enemies of Israel, through the latter prophets such as Isaiah, until the Israel story climaxes in Jesus who perfectly embodied the Father’s nature. It seems to me that to understand the OT we have to do it through the lens of the understanding of God’s nature and its meaning to our live as we see it in Jesus. If we want to understand the meaning of Jesus we need to do it through the OT as the writers of the NT frame much of what they write around the OT.I suggest that if we try to understand the Scriptures as being inerrant in terms of a 21st century mindset we close ourselves off to hearing what God has to say to us through our imaginations. One easy example, as we have covered many times before, is when we read accounts of Yahweh committing and/or ordering genocide and contrast that with Jesus telling us to love our enemies, which were to His target audience the Romans. Those divergent understandings of God cannot be reconciled in spite of what some will say. When we read the accounts of genocide through the lens of Jesus we can know that God did not command or commit genocide. We can also see that the results, of believing in a violent and vengeful god, were hardly fruitful. We can also see that we have to be very discerning when people tell us what it is that God wants us to do. He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God. Micah 6:8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 395 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Phat writes: Can you make a valid argument that people invent various "Jesus" Characters just as they invented "god characters" in the OT? Yes, of course people invent their own Jesus character. You are a great example. We all need to invent what we believe since there is absolutely no actual evidence to support our beliefs.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 395 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Phat writes: Different gods serve different purposes to the devotees who describe them. Correct. Different gods serve different purposes to the devotees who describe them.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18262 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
There are certain world-changing moments in people's lives that they never forget. Being at the scene of 9-11 or even watching it on TV could be said to be one of such moments. No one present shall ever forget the event. And though they may embellish it some in their later years, it will essentially remain etched as it occurred. Arguably the same could have been said to have happened due to the resurrection. If people simply heard second-hand accounts or made it up, the impact would not transfer to succeeding generations. Additionally, the event would not register as a world view changing moment. And yet it does. For some of us, anyway. Would you argue that many Biblical authors had world view changing moments that led to their writings? Or would you say they simply made it up.
Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
As the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom, so the denial of God is the height of foolishness.? R.C. Sproul, Essential Truths of the Christian Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stile Member Posts: 4295 From: Ontario, Canada Joined: |
Thugpreacha writes: There are certain world-changing moments in people's lives that they never forget. Being at the scene of 9-11 or even watching it on TV could be said to be one of such moments. I think you need to spend a bit more time on how memory works. Although most will remember "two planes took out the twin towers"... everything after that is pretty much up for grabs.Some will remember near perfectly. Others will get things mostly wrong. Most will be hit-and-miss for this-and-that. Take a look at this:
quote:This entire first episode (about 20 minutes) is available free on YouTube, I think, if you're interested. From what I can remember [ ], the lady learns that her mother was not in the City "at the time" and it's impossible for her to see the smoke outside her classroom window - the school is geographically too far away to even see any smoke, let alone have it circling her school... and the wind was blowing in the opposite direction that day anyway. No smoke from the towers ever got closer to her school - it got further away. That's how memory works - people think it's accurate, but it's not.That's why we don't rely on memory when something's important. Do you not record important dates/meetings to remember on a calendar? Why would you ever need to do such a thing if your memory was accurate?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 395 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Phat writes: Would you argue that many Biblical authors had world view changing moments that led to their writings? Or would you say they simply made it up. Again Phat, what does the evidence show? First we have absolutely no idea who wrote any of the Old Testament and we only have a very few New Testament writings than can be said to likely have a known author. We do not know who the actual author of any of the Gospels might be but we do know that nothing in Luke is a first hand account. If we look at the portions common to more than one book we see two patterns, either direct quotes that likely came from so other unknown source or particularly in the stories in Luke and the other Gospels classic embellishment. The two examples you and I have discussed many times and in depth are the Great Commission and Paul's highway experience. In only one instance of the latter is there a hint of attribution and that is the tale supposedly told by Saul himself which is really pretty much mundane and without any strong details. There is a notable lack of "world view changing moments" that are first person accounts and changes that are written are more evolutionary than revolutionary. Even Paul's writings show an evolving theology. As one by one the very most basic cornerstones of the early theology failed to match reality the theology itself changed and the Apologist began their revision of the initial theology to try to make it fit reality. The classic example is the END not coming within the time predicted by Jesus thus the Apologist had to redefine the meaning of what was really pretty clear to claim that what Jesus was reported to have said really didn't mean what Jesus was reported to have said. The evidence for such revisionism is pretty ubiquitous; when God says that if you eat the fruit you will die God didn't mean really really dead just spiritually dead.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18262 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
Alex O'Connor is a highly intelligent young man! He is but 18, yet he held his own with Frank Turek, a skilled apologist. What impressed me and many others was the mutual level of respect which both of them had for each other and how the argumentativeness seemed to be a joyful quest for knowledge, truth, and consensus. Edited by Thugpreacha, : No reason given.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
As the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom, so the denial of God is the height of foolishness.? R.C. Sproul, Essential Truths of the Christian Faith |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18262 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
Reviewing his book, found here
Table Of Contents Typical apologetic questions...I'm not too impressed with this guy yet. Sean McDowell seems more experienced and Frank Turek has some good answers to questions, though I am finding that it all boils down to belief rather than evidence. Turek claims that atheists simply do not want to believe and many wouldn't even if presented with irrefutable evidence. Tureks podcast Tangle and Stile have argued that this is not true and is a common claim from apologists. Edited by Thugpreacha, : No reason given.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
As the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom, so the denial of God is the height of foolishness.? R.C. Sproul, Essential Truths of the Christian Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 395 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Phat writes: Turek claims that atheists simply do not want to believe and many wouldn't even if presented with irrefutable evidence. And that is sufficient evidence to simply throw him and his worthless opinions away.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9489 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.8 |
Phat writes: Turek claims that atheists simply do not want to believe and many wouldn't even if presented with irrefutable evidence. Well he's wrong, so you can disregard everything else he says.Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London.I am Finland. Soy Barcelona "Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved." - Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18262 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
WRONG. You are quick to make judgments. Though you have a right to your opinion (and likely have some prejudice of your own regarding apologists in general) you must first listen to at least one of his podcasts before making any statement. After all, you insist I read the Bible in context before challenging your beliefs and statements.
Turek has some valid arguments. In response to atheists who simply say they lack a belief in God and that the onus is on the believers to support the argument, he challenges by asking them to give their explanation (as far as they believe) as to how the universe came about. I cnt simply paraphrase his arguments, though I am beginning to think on my own after listening to the many sides of these faith & belief vs evidence-based discussions. You want to throw anything away that challenges your comfort zone. You think you have it all figured out, don't you? You likely will claim only that you report what the books say and that you rely on logic, reason, reality, and evidence. What is telling, however, is your unmasked disdain for anyone wearing the label of apologist. You are prejudiced against them. You paint the whole lot of them with one broad brushstroke, yet you have no more of an idea than I do. Why must you always be so negative?Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
As the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom, so the denial of God is the height of foolishness.? R.C. Sproul, Essential Truths of the Christian Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18262 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
And you, Mr.Tangle are just as bad. You all always get on Faith for being so set in her ways and yet you are not providing any better arguments than the ones the apologists make. Until and unless you listen to at least one podcast I will likely disregard everything else that *you* say. I swear you guys are as bad as the Populists.
Edited by Thugpreacha, : No reason given.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
As the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom, so the denial of God is the height of foolishness.? R.C. Sproul, Essential Truths of the Christian Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 395 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Phat writes: You want to throw anything away that challenges your comfort zone. Not at all Phat but I do throw away those who make absolutely stupid absurd claims.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18262 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
It may be my fault for summarizing it wrong. His arguments are not stupid.
You likely will disagree with some of them, but hre we go:
quote:I like that bit about chemicals. Ringo once asked why the universe couldn't originate from chemicals in the beginning...he must be a materialist. Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
As the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom, so the denial of God is the height of foolishness.? R.C. Sproul, Essential Truths of the Christian Faith
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024