Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,421 Year: 3,678/9,624 Month: 549/974 Week: 162/276 Day: 2/34 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Biased accounts of intelligent design
JonF
Member (Idle past 189 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 117 of 150 (861572)
08-23-2019 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 115 by Jedothek
08-23-2019 11:37 AM


Re: Geting back to the question of ID
Are you ever going to specify what those alleged bad characterizations and evaluations are?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by Jedothek, posted 08-23-2019 11:37 AM Jedothek has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by Jedothek, posted 08-23-2019 12:12 PM JonF has replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 189 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


(1)
Message 120 of 150 (861588)
08-23-2019 12:36 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by Jedothek
08-23-2019 12:12 PM


Re: Geting back to the question of ID
You can edit Wikipedia.
So you have no problem with the many scientific evaluations that have found ID to be unscientific twaddle?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Jedothek, posted 08-23-2019 12:12 PM Jedothek has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 189 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 128 of 150 (861615)
08-23-2019 6:07 PM
Reply to: Message 127 by WookieeB
08-23-2019 5:54 PM


Re: Simple definition of ID
We all know the official line. Most of us know far more.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by WookieeB, posted 08-23-2019 5:54 PM WookieeB has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024