Who Made God?

Not only do you not understand Christian judgement, but you are being a hypocrite: You tell me not to judge jar, but by doing so you are judging me! So your nonsense concept of Biblical judgement fails at the most fundamental level. In that case, you need to consider the following verses:
Do not judge by appearances, but JUDGE with right judgement. (John 7:24). Oh dear Jesus says we can JUDGE others. My brothers and sisters, if one of you should wander from the truth and someone should bring that person back, remember this: Whoever turns a sinner from the error of their way will save them from death and cover over a multitude of sins. (James 5:19-20)When I say to the wicked, ‘You shall surely die,’ and you give him no warning, nor speak to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life, that same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at your hand. Yet, if you warn the wicked, and he does not turn from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but you have delivered your soul. (Ezk 3:18-19)But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be \[b\]accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again, if anyone preaches any other gospel to you than what you have received, let him be accursed (Galatians 1:8-9). Uh oh - there’s some serious judgement going on here! Fake Christians who don’t preach the same doctrine as the apostles are JUDGED to be accused. Where did you get that silly idea? It certainly isn’t a Catholic point of view. I have no idea at all who is going to hell and I’m not in the least bit qualified to make that judgement (in fact, no human is). Furthermore, I believe that many non-Christians will be saved and go to heaven. Nevertheless, denying the divinity of the earthly Jesus (as jar does) is a serious heresy and those who subscribe to such a view are not considered to be part of the body of Christ (for example, Jehovah’s Witnesses are considered to be fake Christians). Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.

Yeah right - that’s how it might read to a five year-old ignoramus who doesn’t understand that and became man in the Nicene Creed refers to the doctrine of the Incarnation and whose underdeveloped mind doesn’t understand that God cannot stop being God and become just a man.Btw, if Jesus was just a man when he was on the earth, how do you explain the following verse? We are not stoning you because of any good work but for blasphemy, but because you, a mere man, claim to be God. (John 10:33)

Correct. So if Jesus claimed to be God when he was on earth, why do you claim he wasn’t?

This comment is offensive and idiotic. An idiot is someone who cannot speak or read or write. I don't qualify as a idiot.
I'm more likely a moron, a cretin or subnormal.

Unfortunately for your nonsense theory, Jesus is accused of blasphemy in the other three gospels as well (eg, Matt 9:2-3, Mark 2:5-7, Luke 5:20-21). So all four gospels record that Jesus claimed to be God but you claim they’re wrong and that you know better!What sort of so-called Christian blatantly ignores all four gospels and invents his own delusionary theology? A fake Christian, of course.

Er, what does this have to do with what we were talking about??? You claimed that the gospel of John was different it that it reported that Jesus claimed to be God - which I then pointed out is incorrect, because the other three gospels report exactly the same thing. (Btw, I was taught about the difference between the gospel of John and the Synoptic Gospels when I was about thirteen.) No, it’s not a fact. But here is a fact - you don’t know what you’re talking about.You claim that - contrary to the evidence provided by all four gospels - the Nicene Creed says Jesus was just a man while on earth. But your claim is easily demonstrated to be nonsense by this fact: The Nicene Creed was formulated by the Catholic Church, which teaches the dogma of the Incarnation - ie, the earthly Jesus was both fully-God and fully-human.

You're like a drunk fool bumbling and stumbling from one dud argument to the next. The Incarnation is very clearly expressed in the Scriptures, which should take precedence of your ignorant interpretation of the Nicene Creed - but it doesn't, because you deny the Scriptures.You also claim to know better than the Catholic Church (the original and largest Church) and the rest of Christianity, all of whom consider the Incarnation to be a core doctrine of their religion.The only Christians who might agree with your heretical interpretation of the Nicene Creed would be a few misfit fringe-dwellers who aren’t considered to be part of the body of Christ - imposters like Jehovah’s Witnesses and other assorted retards and hillbillies. Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.

post withdrawn Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.

The early Church was called Catholic at least as early as AD107:The first use of the term "Catholic Church" (literally meaning "universal church") was by the church father Saint Ignatius of Antioch (c. 50—140) in his Letter to the Smyrnaeans (circa 110 AD) The earliest recorded evidence of the use of the term "Catholic Church" is the Letter to the Smyrnaeans that Ignatius of Antioch wrote in about 107 to Christians in Smyrna. Exhorting Christians to remain closely united with their bishop, he wrote: "Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_(term)Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.Edited by Admin, : Fix formatting problems.

So why do bother with what you call Christianity, if it’s all a fabrication of the human mind? Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.

Well, in terms of the Bible, my idea of a fabrication is something that doesn’t come from God, but from humans. So if the entire Bible is a product of human minds, then the entire Bible is a fabrication. Nevertheless, I’m interested in which parts of the Bible you consider to be not a fabrication. So you’re Christian on the outside, but not on the inside. In other words, like I said, you’re a fake Christian.Do you believe in life after death?Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.

Your interpretation of the Nicene Creed contradicts the NT, from which the Creed is derived. Hilarious. But you don't believe any of it, which makes your attempts at theology even funnier.

The fact that you’ve put so much effort into debunking the Bible and its supernatural contents strongly suggests you are motivated by some gigantic hang-up about Christianity. Maybe you were abused by some fag priest when you were ten. Who knows? News flash!! God’s official organisation on earth - the Catholic Church - defined exactly what the Bible contains about 1500 years ago. Your anti-Christian phobia is showing again.

Contradiction? All four gospels provide accounts of Jesus being accused of blasphemy by the Jews. In each case, it is because Jesus claimed to be God.

That joke never grows old - makes me laugh every time I hear it!