The thing is you thlnk all that honest endeavor has arrived at truth, so that what you are really saying is that I should acknowledge THAT, their conclusions and not just their methods and motivations.
Not TRVTH™ but the best fit explanation for the known body of fact.
If that best fit says the Earth orbits the sun instead of the other way around who are you, with your lack of knowledge of gravity and orbital mechanics, to say otherwise?
If that best fit says there was no worldwide flud who are you, with your lack of knowledge of geology and hydro mechanics, to say otherwise?
Part of the scientific process you have no respect for is the methods are dissected to excruciating detail to be sure they actually measure what they purport to measure or conclude only what the facts demand.
And motives are constantly assailed to wring out as much personal agenda as possible. I’ve been to conferences where scientists yelled and screamed at each other across a blackboard because of agenda. The days of a Lord Kelvin ruling the scientific roost are way long gone.
That is why there is worldwide consensus on most scientific conclusions like heliocentrism and no stinkin freakin flud.
None of this happens in religion which is why you folks have such a philosophical, fact-less, agenda-centric mess on your hands. What, some 10,000+ different creeds just in your boat alone? Because it’s all fabricated in your head without any fact or logic to back it up. Bad form for seeking TRVTH™.
But the sciences of the past really don't have the safeguards of the hard sciences of the laboratory .
Bullshit.
. so that all the sincere honest scientific work on those sciences is ultimately subjective .
Bullshit.
. and can be wrong even if the whole scientific community agrees.
Now we have agreement. Some of it could be wrong, but not by anything you or your blind anti-scientific creed can produce. But because we are human and sometimes it takes a while for us apes to learn.
So yes, my intransigence is indeed the problem, but the intransigence comes from believing a completely different worldview .
No, it comes from your unwillingness to learn and accept demonstrable fact. I’m not talking conclusions based on those facts, I’m talking your unwillingness to even acknowledge that known demonstrable facts are there.
That is crazy bag lady territory.
Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.