Lizard Breath-
If you are a straight person, you have the right as a human being to choose to gamble that the person you are with loves you and will continue loving your forever. You have the right to show the government that you are betting on this. They then reward you with immediate legal benefits such as the ones discussed previously. If you are a straight person and decide that this person you have declared your love for is not for you, you also have the right to say to that person, eh, sorry, you're not for me. You have the right to then go through the gut-wrenching and horrendous process of divorce. You have the right to make a decision and bear the consequences of this decision. None of these rights are allowed to a gay person in this country. Do you think that this person should have a different set of rules?
In my view, whether or not people *accept* the gay lifestyle is really irrelevant. If people tense up and have negative feelings about gays is also irrelevant. People tensed up when they saw interracial children at one time. I see it as the exact same issue as when some states would not allow a black person to marry a white person. So in both cases I ask, why should this not be allowed? What are the reasons? I can't even see any in both cases. Maybe you can help me understand?