The Right Side of the News

So in an imaginary world she could get more government aid. Which you admit she did not receive as you claimed before.

quote:

---

Hm, and I just remembered a case where a woman in her thirties quit her job to get pregnant because her "clock was running out" and she got welfare and food stamps to help her through it. I'll have to make some phone calls later to see if I've got this right.

---

I note you reject Christianity.

Hate's certainly come from Faith. She's explicitly embraced her hate more than once.Alas, there apparently are millions like her.Anyone is allowed to hate, no matter how irrational. At least Faith is honest enough to admit she hates so many people because of what they are or she thinks they've done. "He started it" was pathetic in first grade and so much more so for adults.

Make up your mind. "I hate leftists with a passion" means you hate leftists with a passion.

Plus Marc is way out of touch. Trump claims that undocumented immigrants are being almost exclusively released into sanctuary cities, which is of course false (since it's Trump). President Trump’s claim that migrants are being sent to sanctuary cities:

quote:

---

The Department of Homeland Security has not announced that it is implementing Trump’s plan to deposit migrants in sanctuary cities. A DHS spokesman declined to comment for this fact check and referred us to the White House, which did not respond to our questions. We also sent questions to ICE and did not receive a response....

​

We asked several of the biggest sanctuary jurisdictions whether the Trump administration had begun to release undocumented immigrants in their turf. “We have not seen any sort of uptick to warrant this claim,” said Matthew McGrath, a spokesman for Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel (D). “But if we did, and as the mayor has indicated, we’d welcome it.” A spokesman for New York Mayor Bill de Blasio (D) told us, “We have seen nothing to indicate such actions from the Trump administration, and we are certainly not turning anyone away.”

​

Perhaps one sanctuary city on Trump’s mind is Oakland, Calif. The president didn’t mention it at the rally or in the interview, but he has feuded with Mayor Libby Schaaf (D) in the past and criticized her again in an April 13 tweet: “So interesting to see the Mayor of Oakland and other Sanctuary Cities NOT WANT our currently ”detained immigrants’ after release ...”

​

In fact, Schaaf said the opposite. “My job as a mayor is to welcome people,” Schaaf told NPR in an interview the same day as Trump’s tweet. “I don’t build walls. It’s our job to welcome everyone into our city, ensure their safety, ensure that their families can thrive. And that is my job no matter where those people came from or how they got there.” (There’s no evidence that the Trump administration has begun to release immigrants into Oakland.)

---

Also, "Trump made that clear when he offered to bus all the illegals he could to sanctuary cities, and then we all watched them cry about that" is just another right-wing fantasy, assuming what they want to happen did happen. Trump threatened sanctuary cities, and they shrugged”here’s why

quote:

---

The president believes the transfer of asylum-seekers to sanctuary jurisdictions would put such an undue burden on those local governments and populations that the people would rise up against their governments’ embrace of sanctuary status. In reality, however, as Table 1 shows, all families apprehended so far this year total an equivalent of 0.16 percent of the population of those sanctuary jurisdictions. Put differently, if those asylum-seekers were spread across sanctuary jurisdictions according to population, those jurisdictions would receive 16 asylum-seekers per 10,000 residents....

​

President Trump’s ideas about relocating immigrants depend on a misunderstanding (perhaps deliberate) of the levels of immigration, the composition of those seeking to come to the United States (and particularly those seeking asylum), the impact of relocation on sanctuary jurisdictions, and the legal basis for his ongoing policy-proposal-by-tweet. Many of the mayors and governors who have declared sanctuary status for their jurisdictions, have effectively said “bring it on.” And why shouldn’t they? The president is offering to send them a host of new, productive economic actors.

---

It's obvious to all that you are not a follower of the teachings of Jesus.

It's impossible to have a modern human society without some loss of freedom and distribution of resources.

"Yes, we are to love everybody, except for the majority of people whom I hate for one or more reasons. "

Almost all those alleged achievements and hopes are illusions. You should listen to others.

IOW you can't come up with one significant achievement. (He had nothing to do with the tax bill other than signing it.)

Crossings have increased since Trump took office, although they're still far short of the peaks in the last 50 or so years. Trump's attempts haven't had a lot of effect, not even his zero-humanity policy (which right-wingers insist was very successful.) IMHO the recent uptick is partly due to it's-now-or-never thinking. If he does implement charging for asylum requests and 180 day maximum processing time there'll be almost no applications and fewer successes. Never mind the realities, dogma is inviolate.

Yeah, but that's all New Testament. Faith is Old Testament only, as demonstrated by her choice of texts and rejection of NT texts.

They can't and don't vote in state or Federal elections. If you want to argue otherwise, include evidence.And let's see the statistics on literacy in their native language, an on "other problems".

The main difference is that sanctuary cities are not violating Federal or any law. They are refusing, as is their right and duty, to enforce Federal law for the agencies responsible for the enforcement.Do you really believe that this administration would not act if they were really violating Feder law?Exactly what Federal law do you think they are violating? Edited by JonF, : No reason given.