Any practical use for Universal Common Ancestor?

All theories are based on observations.

You made the claim that there is no practical use for a UCA. You have been shown that scientists disagree with you. It is up to you to show that they are wrong.

Conveniently, yes.

Nobody expects you to take reality seriously.

The "silly" putdowns just reflect the absurdity of your position.

If you noticed anything it would be a bloody miracle. I have asked you to back up your claim that there is no use for UCA. You have been shown that your claim is nonsense. If you're too dense to see what you've been shown, that may be a reflection on my/our ability to demonstrate but it is not a reflection on the reality of the UCA or its usefulness.

That's exactly what the OP says. Here it is again to remind you:

quote:

---

I've been looking for a practical use in applied science for the information that all life on earth evolved from a microbe that existed billions of years ago, but can't find any. It seems to me that the whole Universal Common Ancestor thing is completely irrelevant and useless outside the realm of evolutionary theory.

---

When you said UCA was useless, what else did you mean other than it has no use?Edited by ringo, : Fixed quote.Edited by ringo, : Splling.

Why would they? Why not just pray to God for healing?

It's kinda like how a cup-holder isn't necessary in a car, even if every car has one.

That's a distinction without a difference. You don't get to define "practical' any more than you get to define "useful". You can't just claim a use is not a practical use.

You can predict that something will be unexplainable just like you can predict that mankind will never fly - but then it happens; the prediction was wrong.That isn't the same as ToE predicting that the gaps will be explained. When a gap is filled in - and it happens every day - you can't unfill it.

But of course it doesn't. No creationist has ever been able to explain the "hydraulic sorting" or demonstrate how it could actually happen.

But that "limitation on the genome" doesn't exist - no creationist has ever been able to demonstrate that it does, or even explain how it could.

You haven't answeted my question: How is it even possible for there to be a "barrier" in the genome when the DNA of every species is made from the same building blocks. What is it exactly that prevents exchanging one block for another? What prevents editing "cat" to "dog"?

That doesn't answer the question. What is the barrier?