am going to put you on the spot, and I hope that you answer me....but if you don't it will only fit a pattern of ignoring anything that challenges your belief.
Wow what a piece of tendentious snark THAT is. And it's not true either, it's one of those false accusations people throw at me, and you are just playing to your unbelieving friends by aping them, since I know you don't understand anything about any of these things.
How is it that you always ignore the requests of EvC members to provide evidence for your claims regarding the science of Geology and age of the earth?
I don't. I've given plenty of evidence for my claims about Geology. If you mean challenges about claims I don't make, for instance the age of the Earth, it's because I don't make scientific claims about that, because I don't feel I have enough understanding to make them. And I've said so quite clearly. I have certain topics I pursue because I believe I understand them well enough to argue them and I provide lots of evidence for them. Where I don't have a scientific point of view I simply take the position of the Statement on Inerrancy, that God's word stands nevertheless, expecting that eventually there may be a scientific answer as well.
Also....do you believe that God has allowed secular science to be deceived due to the fact that they won't put their beliefs ahead of dispassionate evidence?
Huh? It's simple: I think they are wrong, I'm not looking for snarky explanations for why they are wrong. I'll even say they are honestly wrong, they believe in what they are saying. But I believe they are wrong nevertheless.
And in the future I may well ignore you, Phat, whether you do that particular snark thing on me or not, because I don't like your attitude.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.