Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Mankind and dinosaur side by side ? ?
Dr_Tazimus_maximus
Member (Idle past 3217 days)
Posts: 402
From: Gaithersburg, MD, USA
Joined: 03-19-2002


Message 12 of 100 (8339)
04-08-2002 3:07 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by techristian
04-05-2002 10:57 PM


quote:
Originally posted by techristian:
Ever see these links before?

I have, repeatedly. They are a gross compilation of lies, mistakes and misrepresentations largely brought forth by a liar by the name of Carl Baugh. Baugh is a self proclaimed "Ph.D." (self preclaimed because he has never been granted one by a credited school he has one form a school that he made himself)who has made this area his forte. His tracks are a combination of dinosaur tracks with other dinosuar tracks. There have even been some tracks that appear to be man made, which smacks of fraud. Please tell me that this is not what you base your belief on. Here is a decent discussion on some of the tracks
http://members.aol.com/Paluxy2/retrack.htm
------------------
"Chance favors the prepared mind." L. Pasteur
Taz
[This message has been edited by Dr_Tazimus_maximus, 04-08-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by techristian, posted 04-05-2002 10:57 PM techristian has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Cobra_snake, posted 04-08-2002 8:27 PM Dr_Tazimus_maximus has replied

  
Dr_Tazimus_maximus
Member (Idle past 3217 days)
Posts: 402
From: Gaithersburg, MD, USA
Joined: 03-19-2002


Message 14 of 100 (8358)
04-08-2002 11:35 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Cobra_snake
04-08-2002 8:27 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Cobra_snake:
Just so you know, most creation scientists do not support Carl Baugh's proposed evidences.
Yes, I know. I guess that the initiator of this thread did not. What really got to them (the general creationist "camp" if such a generality exists) was, I think, not so much his bogus "man-tracks", which some people in the ICR still try to use, but rather some of his nuttier theories. Did you know that Baugh (I refuse to give him his made up title) has claimed that the earth was surrounded by layers of metallic oxygen and hydrogen and that is where the water for the flood came from. Now that really would be a big bang
.
------------------
"Chance favors the prepared mind." L. Pasteur
Taz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Cobra_snake, posted 04-08-2002 8:27 PM Cobra_snake has not replied

  
Dr_Tazimus_maximus
Member (Idle past 3217 days)
Posts: 402
From: Gaithersburg, MD, USA
Joined: 03-19-2002


Message 92 of 100 (8726)
04-20-2002 8:58 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by techristian
04-16-2002 10:58 AM


quote:
Originally posted by techristian:
To read my entire paper on "Lucy", I have now posted it at my http://etnot.com website, or you can go to it directly at
http://musicinit.com/etnot/lucy.html

OK, this is going to be a little hard but I will try to be civil concerning your site. Your site is either crossing the line or dancing just on it to accusing Johnsons group of fixing the data which, amoung scientists, is about the worse possibe thing that you can do or be accused of. It is also obvious that you know little to nothing about comparative anatomy. I suggest that you read some books on the subject, and on the subject of how paleontology is performed. I would recommend some of Johnsons or Time Whites books on the actual finds. Another good one is called "Message of the Bones" about a H. habelis or H. erectus skeleton, I will try to find the actual reference later today. Anyway, your suggestions about the skeleton being "dwarf humans" is wrong on the face of it. Please input a search with the terms A. aferensis AND human AND morphology AND skeletal. There are a number of good sites out there that list the morphological differences. You can do the same for chimp. Some will also tell you WHY people who understand biomechanics can work in fractured or destroyed bones and put them together into the proper configuration.
As to your DNA comment, the odds of every bone in a skeleton of that age still containing sufficient DNA (if any at all) for a PCR analysis is small to non-existent. You need very special conditions for that.
You really need to learn the basis for the how these sciences work before you make comments like those on your site. Would you accuse a minister of stealing money from the collection plate or of molesting a parishner without evidence; well you have just accused Johnson of something as bad if not worse on your site
. You really need to revise either your erroneous and false interpretation or your language or (my preference) both.
------------------
"Chance favors the prepared mind." L. Pasteur
Taz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by techristian, posted 04-16-2002 10:58 AM techristian has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024