Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Dates and Dating ⇒

Validity of Radiometric Dating

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Validity of Radiometric Dating
Phat
Member
Posts: 18332
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0

Normal Thread Display
Message 197 of 207 (832745)
05-09-2018 11:11 AM 		Reply to: Message 68 by ringo
07-16-2014 1:06 PM

Re: why wiki may be a poor source
ringo writes:
​
Science depends entirely on disagreement. Scientists try to falsify their own hypotheses - if they don't, somebody else might do it for them and make them look bad.
​
Well we all disagree a lot around here. Maybe that makes us all scientists~!
Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith
Paul was probably SO soaked in prayer nobody else has ever equaled him.~Faith
This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by ringo, posted 07-16-2014 1:06 PM ringo has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 198 by ringo, posted 05-09-2018 3:20 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024