|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Creation | |||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 2236 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
ringo writes: No we don't.
The Bible is not true. We know that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 2236 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
ringo writes: Well Genesis does say the stars were put in something.
Did the Hebrews even have a concept of "space"?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 133 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
creation writes: ringo writes: No we don't. The Bible is not true. We know that. Well all honest people know that the Bible stories themselves are evidence that they are not true. There are two mutually exclusive creation myths; the God character in each is different, the order is different, the method of creation is different and both are overwhelmingly refuted by reality.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 2236 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
[qs=jar]Well all honest people know that the Bible stories themselves are evidence that they are not true.[qs] Absurdly false.
There are two mutually exclusive creation myths; the God character in each is different, the order is different, the method of creation is different and both are overwhelmingly refuted by reality. Old wives tale. By Gen 2 it was over and done. Finished. What it covers was no order.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 133 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
creation writes: jar writes: Absurdly false. Well all honest people know that the Bible stories themselves are evidence that they are not true. A mere unsupported assertion, which is all you have ever provided, is just juvenile "nah-nah" tactics common to creationist nonsense. Unfortunately, the reality is that the Bible stories are filled with absurdities, contradictions and simply false statements.
creation writes: jar writes: Old wives tale. By Gen 2 it was over and done. Finished. What it covers was no order. There are two mutually exclusive creation myths; the God character in each is different, the order is different, the method of creation is different and both are overwhelmingly refuted by reality. Again, you are simply showing your rather typical utter ignorance of the Bible, all too common within the Christian Cult of Ignorance. Genesis 2&3 are the far older stories while Genesis 1 was written much later and by an entirely different Hebrew tradition. That the far younger story is placed before the much older tale found in Genesis 2&3 is simply more evidence that the Bible is a creation of man, not God. It also helps explain the two entirely different Gods; the somewhat bumbling not all that smart, hands on learning on the job and not all that honest God of Genesis 2&3 that is friendly, approachable and personable but also fearful versus the extremely competent, decisive God of the newer Genesis 1 tale that is aloof, separate and that has no contact whatsoever with the created.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 706 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
creation writes:
We do, even if you don't. We (humans) know how to split an atom even if you (personally) do not. ringo writes:
No we don't. The Bible is not true. We know that. We don't have to go beyond page 1 of the Bible to find mistakes. You might be able to jump through enough hoops to convince yourself that it's still "true" but you'll find it hard to drag everybody else through the hoops with you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 706 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
creation writes:
It says they were in the "firmament". Note the root word "firm". The Hebrews thought of it as a solid dome over the earth. It has nothing to do with what we call "space".
ringo writes:
Well Genesis does say the stars were put in something. Did the Hebrews even have a concept of "space"?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 321 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi Mod,
Mod writes: I think you are using your program wrong, or you need a new program. Sorry for taking so long to get back to this. The program had received an update that included a bunch of erroneous information. This information had to be purged and restored to the old version and I have finally got it back to where it should be. Strong #1507 εἱλίσσω does not appear in the original text regardless of what any program or anyone says it means. I find no definition for this word. Strong #1667 ελίσσω This Greek word I find a definition for it. To roll up, to coil, roll, rolled. είλισσόμενον does appear in the original text. I find no strong's # for this word nor do I find a definition. It is used in the Textus Receptus, Morphological Greek New Testament, and the Septuagint 1 time in each. So far I haven't found it in early Greek literature.
Mod writes: Strong's says it contains a form of εἱλίσσω. Every translation out there translates it to mean a form of the verb εἱλίσσω 'to roll up' in a tense that should be translated somewhere along the lines of 'when it is rolled'. It makes no difference what anyone says εἱλίσσω is not in the Greek Text. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 321 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi DOCJ,
Welcome to the fray. DOCJ writes: I was referencing a point that the big bang hypothesis would need to explain a larger outside space to exist for it to expand. In any other case it would not explain itself because something expanding does need a place to expand. However, where that place came from could not be explained within the realm of Science. You will continually have the issue of needing an explanation to further explain the issue of where the space came from initially. Don't you know science does not have to have any basis for anything? All you need is an assumption that the universe that existed at the point you mentioned and did not exist 1 billionth of a second earlier by some miracle began to exist. Then it began to expand into itself as there is nothing outside of that little pea sized thing that existed, and nothing exists outside of it still. That sounds just as believable as a lot of the things YEC'S post. God Bless, "John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 321 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi creation,
creation writes: I do not see the sun in there anywhere. You seem to be trying to adjust it to what you think science demands. I do see that the sun will go out...dark in the very end. Cities will need to use candles. Well, since every tower on earth will shake to the ground, maybe using the word city is a stretch, but you get the drift. No there is no sun mentioned in the scripture and none needed to cause the universe to melt. Scientist is the ones who think the sun is going to melt the earth not the universe. The only Scientist who believe the universe is going to melt is those who believe in some version of the bounce theory.
creation writes: Beliefs. They might as well say they believe a turtle had a bowel movement and out popped the universe. That sounds just as plausible as what they have told me.
creation writes: The heat thing probably refers to the earth area anyhow. We do see God sends fire from heaven to melt the surface of the earth and cleanse it after the 1000 years reign. Probably that is when Peter is talking about...not constellations 'melting'! Why would Peter mean just the earth and refer to the heavens and the earth? That is the same phrase as found in Genesis 1:1 when they were created. When sin entered into the universe everything in it was un-pure. It all must be purified by fire and a new heaven and a new earth created for Revelation 21:1 to be true.
creation writes: Actually stars are not even mentioned till several verses later. You infer that because you want to get billions of years in by verse one for no apparent reason. Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.The Hebrew word that is translated created is a verb 1ps perfect. The Hebrew language in which the Bible was written had no tenses. It only had verbs of action. They were either perfect (completed action) or imperfect (incomplete action) Because a perfect verb was used the heavens and the earth and everything in existence in it began to exist in the first light period that ended with the darkness created that covered the earth as found in Genesis 1:2. Other that the things created in the other 2 creation events. Event 2 Genesis 1:21 "And God created great whales", nothing else in this verse is created as it was call forth in verse 20. Event 3 Genesis 1:27 "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them." Now if you can show me where anything else was created please present the Scripture. I believe the universe and everything in it was created in 6 periods of light and 6 periods of darkness and the seventh light period God created nothing else as He ceased from His work. God did not lie when He declared, "the evening", of the first period of light and the "morning" that closed the first period of darkness, "יום אתד". (translation Day One.) So no I don't put billions of years into time as we know it as it has only existed as we know it. Until God set to great lights in the firmament to rule the day and night there was no time as we know it. I believe creation event #2 and #3 took place about 6,000 years ago according to the rotation of our earth in relation to the sun. As to when the 1st creation event took place there is no way of knowing when that event took place other than to say it took place in the first light period that ended with the darkness found in Genesis 1:2. Now if you think time is a dimension like some, I will ask you as I have asked others to tell me how to measure time. You can not measure it with a watch as they only measures the duration between events. Time is the duration of existence between events in eternity that we measure by various means based on the rotation of the earth in relation to the sun. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 321 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi ringo,
ringo writes: The Bible is not true. We know that. You have a lot of faith don' you. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 321 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi ringo,
ringo writes: There is no distinction between "space" and "material" in Genesis 1. Did the Hebrews even have a concept of "space"? It seems to me that the man writing about the events of Genesis chapter 1 was above some events looking on what was taking place and at other times standing on the water looking up and eventually on the ground looking up and out He spent 80 days and nights in the mount with God in which God could have showed him the events as they took place."John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 321 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi ringo,
ringo writes: The Hebrews thought of it as a solid dome over the earth. It has nothing to do with what we call "space". Could you point out the scriptures that support such an assertion as they thought of it as "a solid dome over the earth"? I can not find an instance in the Bible that refers to a solid dome. I do find where those who rendered raki'a by firmamentum regarded it as a solid body. That means it came from the Latin Vulgate which did not exist until the 4th century AD and not from the Hebrew text. Besides the waters that are above is said to be above the heavens that means at least 2 heavens which would put it above the edge of our universe. Opps I forgot there is nothing outside the universe. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 321 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi ringo,
ringo writes: We don't have to go beyond page 1 of the Bible to find mistakes. Produce the evidence to support your assertion. I can find mistakes throughout translations but I don't find any on the oldest manuscripts we have on the first page. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Pressie Member (Idle past 269 days) Posts: 2103 From: Pretoria, SA Joined: |
This thread is in the Science Forums. Please refrain from using Thor in this thread.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given. Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025