Mankind and dinosaur side by side ? ?

Ever see these links before? http://www.zillmer.com/rezeengl.htm
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/tracks.htm
http://members.truepath.com/objective/creation.htmlDan
http://musicinit.com/pvideos.html

Mister PamboliHow old is your son?Anyways I heard about the man with dinosaur tracks years ago. I probably didn't find you the best link.My own thoughts about time and space require no such evidence to prove the inerrancy of the bible. I do believe in an approx. 6000 year old earth, FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF GOD speaking through Moses in Genesis. The New Testament compares God to LIGHT and it is easy for me to see how the Creator moving at the speed of light could see creation as taking only 6 days. While 6 days passed for Him millions of years may have passed on earth.If in death the spirit moves also at light speed, the confusion in some churches about SOUL SLEEP might also disappear. The spirit will be instantly with the Lord, while thousands of years may pass here before "the end of the world".However this type of topic may be better if moved to CARBON DATING area. There are so many SUB FORUMS HERE.

Here's another question. If evolution theory is more than just pseudo-science, then please show me some proof using SCIENTIFIC METHOD. Fruit fly experiments prove nothing because after your experiments are finished, you are still left with fruit flies. I have never heard of fruit flies BEING OBSERVED evolving into birds, frogs or even crickets.Here is also a question. Can any scientist prove that evolution is 100% CORRECT or just "Darwinian fundamentalism"???Dan
http://musicinit.com/music.html

I'm not sure how many toes were there, but I only SAW 4 toes. (but there was possibly another one next to the big toe) The size of foot and length of stride was consistent with an ERECT modern man just over 6 feet tall.As to a spear in a dinosaur , try to catch one, on foot, running 30-70 miles per hour.Now I have a few questions for you. Where are your transitional species ? Why are there still certain life forms unchanged when compared to fossils "millions of years old" ? When a new SPECIES is supposedly evolved, it must only mate within the species. WHO DOES THE FIRST ONE OF A SPECIES MATE WITH ? Once again where are your transitional species?Dan
http://musicinit.com

But the bigger question is HOW DID YOUR GULLS GET WINGS or how did any bird get wings in the first place? If you believe in micro-evolution then the wings would have started out as CUMBERSOME stubs and then next move to LARGER USELESS wings before any bird could take flight. These cumbersome limbs would have made the creatures EASY PREY and hardly the "fittest" evolutionary creatures of the Darwinian model. If you believe in macro-evolution then the wings would appear all of a sudden COMPLETELY FUNCTIONAL. (getting close to creation here!)Dan http://musicinit.com

First of all I gave you a plausible answer for the spear.
Second are we to assume that because you don't have chicken bones in your stomach that you don't eat chicken?Dan
http://musicinit.com/pvideos.html

Now let's get back to the supposed "evolution" of bird wings. Suppose rather than the wings growing from STUBS, as I have implied before, the poor creature becomes CRIPPLED as its front paws/claws are HALF AND HALF, USELESS FOR RUNNING FROM PREDATORS, BUT NOT YET FULLY DEVELOPED FOR FLIGHT. Oh yes, this seems like a real FIT species! And according to Darwin this poor creature might be LIMPING around in this half crippled state for a MILLION YEARS OR MORE? Not plausible at all. Oh and while this "bird" is developing "wings" it will be simultaneously developing FEATHERS and A LIGHTER BONE STRUCTURE. All at the same time! I think it is more LOGICAL to believe CREATION.Dan
http://musicinit.com/music.html

Ok here is your answer Mark.First of all I won't accept one type of GULL and another type of GULL. THEY ARE BOTH GULLS FOR CRYING OUT LOUD !
Secondly I won't accept one type of SALAMANDER and another type of salamander. THEY ARE BOTH SALAMANDERS !
Third I would like to ask if breeding was even ATTEMPTED (in a labratory) between both creatures at both ends of the "ring".I won't accept "Lucy". After watching that program I noticed many things that weren't quite right about the "skeleton" such as different color bones. (which would lead me to think that "Lucy" was actually a combination of the bones of more than one individual.) I wrote an entire paper on the "Lucy" program.To answer you honestly, there have been so many SCAMS with "Pilt Down Man" and others that I would almost need a missing link to walk up to me and say "I am a missing link. Try to disprove it!" Even "carbon dating" has been disproved when a pig bone (buried only a few years earlier) was said to be "MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD"Scientists already tried to make their own "missing link" when they transplanted a baboon heart into a baby.............................. and FAILED MISERABLY.Now Mark please tell me what it would take to make you believe in a SUPREME CREATOR.Dan
http://musicinit.com

To read my entire paper on "Lucy", I have now posted it at my http://etnot.com website, or you can go to it directly at http://musicinit.com/etnot/lucy.html