|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1735 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Tension of Faith | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 703 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
I suppose it could be reverse-engineered that way - but what it actually says is that God magically poofed the material objects into existence with His words. Notice that in verse 5 Enoch was magically poofed out of existence instead of dying. That doesn't imply anything about atoms.
I always thought this implied that material objects were made of atoms.. but that was simply my interpretation of that verse.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18690 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.5 |
Atoms make the most sense to me. They are what makes up things that are seen and yet they themselves are unseen.
Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith Paul was probably SO soaked in prayer nobody else has ever equaled him.~Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1735 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Seems to me the fallen mind must possess a mere shadow of its original powers of understanding and knowledge. Since the regeneration of the new birth gives us the intuitive knowledge of the basic truths of the Christian revelation, there must originally have been an ability to intuitively grasp all kinds of truths we no longer possess.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1735 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Conclusion follows from premise and that is certainly a very simple logical point. You don't need to believe the premise for the logic to be true.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17981 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
Oh look, no answer. Looks like the Bible has defeated Faith and her God yet again.
And just as a reminder, the key question is:
Then please explain to me how Jesus can be any use as a sign that the Assyrians are going to conquer Aram and Israel.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member
|
Atoms make the most sense to me. They are what makes up things that are seen and yet they themselves are unseen. I don't think it's talking about physical things. If you read the whole chapter, as well as the end of Chapter 10 and the beginning of Chapter 12, it reads as if it is talking about the unseen future.
quote: quote: quote: The lesson is to keep your faith and press on even when you're not sure what the outcome is going to be. God is in charge of what is going to happen an He'll make it right if you stand by your faith and do the right thing. That's my take on it. It doesn't have anything to do with atoms, or in Faith's case granting believers special Bible-reading powers.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1735 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
You're right, it does have to work as a sign to Ahaz, and I'm sure it does but I don't care to research it right now. Even so, it is definitely a prophecy of the virgin birth of the Messiah, because the New Testament says so, and the traditional Church says so, for a couple of millennia already, and they have a lot more authority than any unbeliever.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17981 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
quote: And you have put a lot of effort into trying to deny it. So much for your "regenerate mind"
quote: The truth isn't decided by authority. Whoever wrote the Gospel According to Matthew took a small part of Isaiah out of context. Read in context it doesn't appear to refer to a virgin birth at all (nobody claims one happened in the reign of Ahaz), or the Messiah (nobody claims that the child born then was the Messiah) - and if there's some hidden meaning it is very well hidden. And simply appealing to dubious authorities (and they certainly are dubious!) doesn't help that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1735 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Matthew took nothing out of context. The New Testament is all God's word. You don't get a vote.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17981 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6
|
quote: Obviously wrong. You should try actually studying the Bible sometime, if you are capable of it. (And let's not forget that you were aggressively wrong about Isaiah 7 for some time, before you call that a personal attack)
quote: According to your idols. The actual books of the New Testament make no claim to be "all God's word". Not one of them.
quote: The truth isn't decided by voting either.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 130 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Faith writes: Matthew took nothing out of context. The New Testament is all God's word. You don't get a vote. Too funny. We get to read and we have the great gift from the Garden of Eden, to know right from wrong and so know that the author of Matthew took pieces parts out of context and tried to pretend it was whole cloth. It seems lots of the rubes even bought it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 23047 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 6.6 |
Phat writes: I always thought this implied that material objects were made of atoms.. but that was simply my interpretation of that verse. That makes a lot of sense, but my guess is that that passage has had an interpretation for centuries, before we knew about atoms. I just took a look over at BibleHub's interpretation of Hebrews 11:3, they have the commentary from several sources, and it looks like the most common interpretation is along the lines of the universe of things not having a worldly origin. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1735 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
I don't think I've ever seen your "reading" of the Bible on any subject even once approach reasonableness. Matthew is a lot smarter and more honest than you by a long loooooooong shot. The Bible is God's word and it will be your judge in the end.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 130 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Too funny Faith.
The difference is I am honest about what the Bible actually says while Biblical Christians just make shit up and deny the Bible says what it says. If the Bible is God's word then God can't get the story straight, is often factually wrong and takes passages out of context. The reality that the Bible actually contains what it contains and says what it says is not a problem for me, because I know it is human words, not God's words. That's why there really isn't "The Bible" but rather only the Bible that is chosen by particular chapters of Club Christian.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1735 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Wait and see.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025