|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The TRVE history of the Flood... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CRR Member (Idle past 2494 days) Posts: 579 From: Australia Joined: |
How about a meteorologist with a Masters Science degree in Atmospheric Science from the University of Washington writing about the ice age?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1656 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
How about a meteorologist with a Masters Science degree in Atmospheric Science from the University of Washington writing about the ice age? Which one? Enjoyby our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CRR Member (Idle past 2494 days) Posts: 579 From: Australia Joined: |
Michael J. Oard, a meteorologist with a Masters Science degree in Atmospheric Science from the University of Washington writing about the ice age
What caused the Ice Age?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pressie Member (Idle past 227 days) Posts: 2103 From: Pretoria, SA Joined: |
I'd actually laugh at a meteorologist with a Masters Degree in Atmospheric Science writing about 'the ice age'.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9580 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 6.6
|
quote: Are you ever going to bring us a respected scientist in a relevant field that is not also a fundy creationist?Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London. "Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved." - Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1656 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Michael J. Oard, a meteorologist with a Masters Science degree in Atmospheric Science from the University of Washington writing about the ice age What caused the Ice Age? You repeat you link, I repeat my question, because your link does not answer it properly (it lies).
quote: At least 5 major ice ages. With millions of years between them. Also see General Overview of the Ice Ages. Curiously, on a side note the ice cores dating in Antarctica are currently reaching ~1 million years of accumulated layers of ice. Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1, Message 8:
quote: In addition, ice ages are known to transgress and regress over periods of thousands of years, and this is documented in the ice cores for the last ice age. Enjoy Edited by RAZD, : .by our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pollux Member (Idle past 136 days) Posts: 303 Joined:
|
There is abundant evidence against a single post-flood Ice Age, and against catastrophic plate tectonics.
About 100 years ago the geologist Du Toit could not make sense of the distribution of fossils and the direction of movement of the Permian ice sheets in South America and Africa. He heard of the ideas of Wegener for moving continents and realised putting them together made a good fit.This showed that the Ice Age occurred BEFORE the continents parted. Cores from the ocean floor near the coast of Spain gives an example of other evidence. Layers of fine silt with forest pollens alternate with ones of coarse deposit and grass pollens. This is because under warm conditions the core site is far from the shore so only fine silt from the nearby rivers reach it, and a warm forest grows on the land. Under Ice Age conditions, lower sea level means the core is close to the shore so heavier sediment is still reaching it, and cool grassland is on shore. Even without absolute age determinations, a significant time is required for many cycles of warm and cool cycles to occur. As RAZD indicated, using time determinations cycles of 23,000, 40,000, 100,000, and 400,000 years can be seen. For many years it was not clear why the 100,000 year cycle occurred, but it is now resolved. The fact that the problem was openly discussed is an indication that what was being reported was true, and not due to a long age mindset. As an aside, Noah did not seem to notice the Ice Age when he planted his vineyard
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 279 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi kjsimons,
kjsimons writes: Are you for real? Plate tectonics is not a controversial theory and the continents are all still on the move. Europe and North America are moving away from each other at about an inch a year, we can and do measure these things. Do you deny that continents are still moving? Well I know the land mass was all in one place at one time Genesis 1:9 tells me that. Genesis 10:25 tells me that in the days of Peleg the earth was divided. The continents are still moving but they are slowing down. God Bless, "John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pollux Member (Idle past 136 days) Posts: 303 Joined:
|
There are chains of sea-mounts and islands in the oceans with probably the best known the Hawaiian-Emperor sea-mounts which are formed as a tectonic plate moves over a hot spot. The magma from the hot spot builds up an undersea mountain which will break the surface if it gets big enough.
As the plate moves it carries the mount away, that volcano dies and a new one forms over the hot spot. The weight of the mount gradually causes the ocean crust to sag and the mount sinks, often with a growth of coral if it were high enough. RM dating of these sea-mount chains shows an increase in age as you move away from the hot spot, and this increase is consistent with the expected age with the rate of plate movement. The YEC idea of catastrophic plate tectonics (CPT) and accelerated RM decay during the Flood requires the two processes to amazingly occur in step to make it look as though it took a long time.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pollux Member (Idle past 136 days) Posts: 303 Joined:
|
Associated problems with CPT include -
1. Rate of magma production needs to be 10,000,000 to 100,000,000 times current rates to build the mounts before they move off the hot spot. At least 3,000,000 cubic kilometres of basalt has to be poured out on India for the Deccan Traps as it moves over the Reunion hot spot. This has to cool quickly enough to show discrete layers (Trap comes from a word meaning step). 2. An appropriate of amount magma has to be poured out at the mid-ocean spreading ridges as the plates move apart, again orders of magnitude faster than currently observed. This has to cool fast enough to take on the appropriate magnetic pole direction, as, for some reason, The Flood is accompanied by frantic reversals of the magnetic poles in CPT. 3. At the other end of the plates as they subduct, they have to rapidly dive 400 km deep to melt to magma, which then burrows up to build the island arcs such as the Aleutians, and all the volcanoes of the ring of fire with massive production of volcanic ash etc. 4. This all happens without leaving a massive layer of volcanic ash around the Earth, and with the heat from the accelerated RM decay not melting the Earth. The ideas of CPT and a post-Flood Ice Age are dead in the water, so to speak!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edge Member (Idle past 1958 days) Posts: 4696 From: Colorado, USA Joined:
|
Well I know the land mass was all in one place at one time Genesis 1:9 tells me that.
Yeah, 200 million years ago. I'm sure that the Bible was talking about Pangea. And how could it 'all be in one place'? That doesn't really make sense.
Genesis 10:25 tells me that in the days of Peleg the earth was divided.
So, being 'divided' means plate tectonics? Why was the 'earth' divided and not the land?
The continents are still moving but they are slowing down.
You may be accidentally correct here, but the evidence says that it has been going on for over a billion years and is likely to continue for a long time yet.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14174dm Member (Idle past 1360 days) Posts: 161 From: Cincinnati OH Joined: |
All I see are assertions without evidence or links to evidence.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14174dm Member (Idle past 1360 days) Posts: 161 From: Cincinnati OH Joined:
|
You have never seen a tablecloth removed from a table that has a 6 place setting of all glasses, plates, forks, knives, spoons and food removed without disturbing them, have you? EVERY time I have seen the table cloth trick, the plates, etc ALL jerk a couple inches no matter how good the performer. That's where the whiplash comes in. To suddenly move billions of tons of rock and everything sitting on them thousands of miles and just as suddenly stop them will have consequences. Shattered rock where plates come together rather than folded as we find in the Appalachian Mountains for example. You didn't answer WHY? Wouldn't it be more impressive to humanity if God struck in a straight forward and immediate way? My experience is that humans learn much better from a direct & immediate consequence.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 279 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi edge,
edge writes: Yeah, 200 million years ago. I'm sure that the Bible was talking about Pangea. And just how do you know that Pangea existed 200 million year ago?
edge writes: And how could it 'all be in one place'? That doesn't really make sense. I was referring to dry land as there was wet land under all the ocean.But actually the water was gathered to one place and left the dry land. edge writes: So, being 'divided' means plate tectonics? I don't think of it being plate tectonics. I think of it as a puzzle together then moved to the different parts.
edge writes: You may be accidentally correct here, but the evidence says that it has been going on for over a billion years and is likely to continue for a long time yet. You don't have to believe it but that was no accident. The plate movement is slowing, that is a fact. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member (Idle past 279 days) Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: |
Hi Pollux,
Pollux writes: The ideas of CPT and a post-Flood Ice Age are dead in the water, so to speak! I will agree that what YEC'S talk about could not happen. I am proposing that the continents moved to their present positions from their former location in 1 single nano second. In case you did not know a nano second is 1 billionth of a second. You say that could not happen. And with normal knowledge that would be impossible. But what is impossible for man and his thinking is simply child's play for God. If I remember correctly everything is made up of atoms. All those atoms are held together by something magical called dark energy or dark matter. Something which no one has seen or understand. It just has to be or the universe would fly apart. Let me introduce you to that energy that holds the universe together.
quote: The Greek word translated consist means: 1.to place together, to set in the same place,to bring or band together. Digging a little further you find The Lexicon also says 4.to put together, unite parts into one whole. God spoke and the atoms simply relocated to their present location in a nano second. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024