Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,386 Year: 3,643/9,624 Month: 514/974 Week: 127/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Contradictions: Hint that Genesis 1 and 2 are Allegorical
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2349 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 78 of 112 (810350)
05-28-2017 9:30 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by lpetrich
04-21-2003 1:16 PM


Genesis is not allegorical
Ipetrich,
You must be an atheist or evolutionist, as you are just into theories rather than trying to discern truths.
The exact dating method of Genesis, written by Moses, shows consistencies and agrees with the geologic record... meaning it is not allegorical but definitive and exact, and fits in with all other time frames of creation from the BEGINNING.
Deniers will deny, but denials are not proofs of an allegorical semantic GENESIS.
Do the math, see the time frames, note the scenario of events and the consistencies..... and then test out the ultimate writer of Genesis.
Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.

Evolutionists are brainless whoosies, gutless and cowards.
They are not scientists, but religionists that choose to deny facts and truths of science. Intelligence and design always defeats their lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is a losers doctrine, simply because they are either lazy or dishonest.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by lpetrich, posted 04-21-2003 1:16 PM lpetrich has not replied

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2349 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 81 of 112 (811034)
06-04-2017 10:25 AM
Reply to: Message 80 by jar
05-30-2017 7:55 AM


Re: Creationism and Evolution differ greatly
Sorry, my God is consistent and the Trinity is consistent and true, despite your preachers insistence that it is contradictory.
True Science proves al fields of science, and luck and chance have nothing to do with true Science.
The Bible is literal and means what it says and states.
But there is even more. The God character in Genesis 1 is entirely different than the God character in Genesis 2&3.
In the much younger account in Genesis 1 the God is aloof, overarching, totally competent, acting by will alone but apart, separate, having no contact, communion or interactions with the creation. In the older account found in Genesis 2&3 the God is entirely different, human, somewhat fumbling, learning on the job by trial and error but having direct contact and communion and interaction with the created.
Nor is the story in Genesis 2&3 told from Adam's point of view.
The position you market is simply that of the apologist trying to deny what is actually written and to make the Bible fit the narrative created by the apologist.
The writer of Genesis was Moses, and he knew the Lord face to face. You denying this, is wierd, strange and contradictory.. nevertheless as a individual you are allowed to deviate and make up whatever stories you desire that fits your lifestyle. Go for it.
I will just stick to science and the logic and reason and mathematics, physics and chemistry and viology of creation. It proves itself.... without contradiction. Literal and meaningful.

Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.
Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by jar, posted 05-30-2017 7:55 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by jar, posted 06-04-2017 10:44 AM Davidjay has replied

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2349 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 83 of 112 (811038)
06-04-2017 10:54 AM
Reply to: Message 82 by jar
06-04-2017 10:44 AM


Re: Creationism and Evolution differ greatly
Thats funny Jar..
You say that the facts of Genesis 1,2 and 3 are facts but allegorical... allegorical facts.. Hmm a new evolutionary word, that defies explanation, just thought up to further confuse your mind and the minds of readers..
Allegorical facts....
I like literal facts and science not your semantic evolutionary 'allegorical facts'

Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.
Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by jar, posted 06-04-2017 10:44 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by jar, posted 06-04-2017 10:57 AM Davidjay has not replied

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2349 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 87 of 112 (811117)
06-05-2017 9:50 AM
Reply to: Message 86 by jar
06-05-2017 6:48 AM


Re: No contradictions
You make shit up in your intestines, thats biological fact, not evolutionary allegorical facts...and then say I misrepresent your feces, as if it wasn;t feces.
Evolutionists are so desperate to degrade the Lord and His Biology, yet try to take credit for His amazing creations.
Now thats contradictory, they are so confused.
The Lord via Moses, His prophet and the writer of Genesis, was not confused or talking about a myth, but the straight forward chronology and dating and history of mankind.
Evolutionists have no history and still dont know where mankind came from...

Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.
Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by jar, posted 06-05-2017 6:48 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by jar, posted 06-05-2017 11:08 AM Davidjay has not replied

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2349 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 96 of 112 (811491)
06-08-2017 7:00 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by Dredge
06-07-2017 5:53 AM


Re: No contradictions
TRUE Dredge..... Genesis is exact and reads as history because it is history, and that contradicts the atheists and evolutionists and makes them mad at the worldwide flood and its proofs and exactness. So they fight it tooth and nail, and demand that their creationist opposition stops. So they attempt to shut them up, one way or another.
SEE and study the TRUE HISTORY OF THE FLOOD thread..... its my thread suggestion and my proofs, but it just straight from Genesis and anyone can prove it for themselves.....
There are no contradictions, in the geological amazing record. No missing links or misssing gaps, its all chronological and exact
I am not allowed to give my hyperlinks but anyone can find out the history for themselves if they search and are honest.
.
.
Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.

Thanks to the webmasters HERE for allowing me to defeat atheists and evolutionists HERE, and show they have no math, no science backing them up and that they are totally dependant on semantics and luck and chance as their only support for their religion. Thanks again...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by Dredge, posted 06-07-2017 5:53 AM Dredge has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by Coyote, posted 06-08-2017 7:56 PM Davidjay has replied

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2349 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 98 of 112 (811501)
06-08-2017 8:05 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by Coyote
06-08-2017 7:56 PM


Re: No contradictions
See TRUE HISTORY OF THE WORLDWIDE FLOOD... I have proven it and its exactness many times, if you dont like it so be it. Your problem. The dating has been solved and is EXACT. Deal with it.
And as you already know, I am not allowed to oppose your fantasities in science there, and so just hang out in the COFFEE SHOP and am teaching biblical and prophecy truths NOW.
The SCIENCE field is totally without opposition, as thats the only way evolutionists are used to operating and enforcing their luck and chance doctrine and theory.
Gensis 1 and 2 are not allegorical but literal... and the 24 hour day is justified rather than eons between the plant life creation and the sun creation by the Lord of all Creations... sometimes called the Lord of Lords and King of Kings.... also called JESUS.
Ha, I can supposedly write his NAME here becauyse this is the BIBLE sub-board, so I think I can get away with it. We shall see, oh how the evolutionsts/atheists complain...... even about the Bible.
Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.

Thanks to the webmasters HERE for allowing me to defeat atheists and evolutionists HERE, and show they have no math, no science backing them up and that they are totally dependant on semantics and luck and chance as their only support for their religion. Thanks again...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by Coyote, posted 06-08-2017 7:56 PM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by Coyote, posted 06-08-2017 8:09 PM Davidjay has replied

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2349 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 100 of 112 (811513)
06-08-2017 10:37 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by Coyote
06-08-2017 8:09 PM


Re: No contradictions
You must be a protected species ?

Thanks to the webmasters HERE for allowing me to defeat atheists and evolutionists HERE, and show they have no math, no science backing them up and that they are totally dependant on semantics and luck and chance as their only support for their religion. Thanks again...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by Coyote, posted 06-08-2017 8:09 PM Coyote has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024