|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2328 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Evolution is a racist doctrine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2328 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Raz says through his posted graph that humans came from
( EvC Forum: Information... Message 328 ) Humans came from Homininae, which came from Hominidae which evolved from Hominoidae which evolved from Hominoidea.... I win, evolutionist is such a lie and so bogus, to be almsot laughable if it wasnt taken so seriously by the evolutionists. Its just semantics brethren and non brethren, just word manipulation and spelling... Read it again and marvel, that evolutionists actually believe our ancestors followed this spelling lineage...... Humans ancestor was Homininae, which came from Hominidae which evolved from Hominoidae which evolved from Hominoidea.... More concisely put in a flow chart for clarity Human-Homininae-Hominidae-Hominoidae-Hominoidea.... There it is BREAKING NEWS, we humans evolved from Hominoidea's 20 million years ago..... our ancestors are hominoidea's.. I say our ancestors were humans, the same as us. Evolutionists say different, you choose your ancestor, and see if spelling is the defining factor or whether truth and science and common sense prevails.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2328 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
As mentioned, evolution does not know who our ancestors were, or are too embarassed to say so.
Their graphs from their artists, and their linguistic efforts from their paid professors, show that its just semantics... they change a letter here or there and try to group animals or kinds or species or breeds into a confusing mess of names. These clades, or groupings or semantic titles then supposedly show our ancestors. So I repeat, who are our ancestors. Have a brave evolutionists say or write what the FLOW CHART of our ancestry came from. Flow chart, not semantic names of groupings...a flow chart. Evolution preaches one kind evolved into another kind, so from which kind did we evolve from.... go back as far as you can ... especially to one celled organisms if possible and state your flow chart. I know its embarassing, but be honest and do it... OK OK, Ill start and answer from a creationists perspective, logical, rational, scientific and concise. We came from other humans, the same all the way back to the starting couple. Now your turn evolutionists and athiests, whats your flow chart ? . Gotcha again. Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.Evolutionists are brainless whoosies, gutless and cowards. They are not scientists, but religionists that choose to deny facts and truths of science. Intelligence and design always defeats their lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is a losers doctrine, simply because they are either lazy or dishonest.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2328 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
As mentioned many times, where did primates come from. Who were their ancestors all the way back to single cells or whatever you evolutionists deem strated life.
Your chart, back millions or billions of years is still amongst primates, as they are close enough in looks for you to pretend to extrapolate for the undiscerning that humans came from monkeys, and chimps. If you note, the question is where did primates come from..what is their ancestry ? But if you like can you answer this simple evolution question, that evolutionists seem to disagree on.. HEREIN Did one species change into another species... I thought evolution teaches this, even as you show your supposed flow chart of primates... Does one species turn into a new and different species or KIND ? Thanks very much if you can answer this very easy question... Much appreciatedEvolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2328 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Please study and read all the original posts of mine........ and then answer the question.
Did one species evolve and create a new species and KIND. In the past, it appears that evolutionists say there has been no branching and no new species, and yet you evolutionists come up with artists depictions of branching, as if chimps or monkeys produced mankind. Do state whether evolution produces new kinds ?Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2328 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Already have and have already won the debate...
But evolutionists never admit defeat because their whole lives are dependant on luck and chance, even in debating. But do answer evolutionists if evolution teaches whether one species or KIND turns into another species or KIND. Come on..... and theres your simplified certified and verified answer for your question whether evolution is a racist doctrine. The answer as proven in over 300 posts, maybe 60 of them mine is...YES, Yes, as in Yes... evolution is a racist doctrine that supports racism or can be used to support racism in weak minded individuals and weak minded nations and their weak minded leaders.Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2328 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Reminds me of one evolutionist preaching to another evolutionist when neither evolutionist knows from whence they came or where they are going ?
Now back to evolution is a racist doctrine, as Razz used the word 'branching' even though within and earlier, evolutionists denied that evolution taught branching and diversity into supposed new species from the old species called 'humans' Thats racism folks and READERS,, even though evolutionists from their branches will not admit it. Jesus wins, racism loses, equality wins, racism loses.Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2328 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Just answer the question, rather than worrying about getting trapped by your elusive answers. Just be honest and answer ..
Does one species branch off and become a new species and KIND according to evolutionary doctrine ?Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2328 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Curiously I got slightly different results from paleos, and your link also now shows chiroptera under Laurasiatheria, not Archonta, while primates are under the sister branch, Euarchontaglires.
Above Razz writes her new theory on where we come from, because evolutionists in no way agree on where we came from... and all strive to become the brightest theorist of the theorists that theorise on their theories. More proof that evolutionists dont know which is why they are so hesitant to answer and be honest... and admit their ignorance. They hate to admit that evolution dictates that humans themselves have to be branching out if evolution is tue, and that means that new human species or kinds or races would be different than the original species, meaning it is a basis for racism in weakened minds. Jesus is for equality and is not a racist and has no favorites unlike evolutionary doctrine.Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2328 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Wow, 'If there are changes over time then we will all change together as long as we all freely interbreed.'
You evolutionists are truly ytricky and deceptive and only have semantics as I have shown over and over again and again... Taq, you use the word IF, if as in IF, and then suggest or tell an untruth or lie, and state that we will all change together.. CHANGE TOGETHER.... what ? You cant make evolution make all of us change together so that we become a whole new species and KIND all together. Where did you god of selection disappear to, thats prtobably the most desperate irrational cop out sentence I have ever heard from an evolutionist EVER. WE WILL CHANGE TOGETHER,,, IF If. Anf then you state that If we do not interbreed, and yet you have stated that inbreeding proves evolution on other threads. You evolutionists have to get real and consistent. You love inbreeding when it suits your contrived purposes, and then when you know you are backing a branching racist doctrine, then you want to bind humans into not inbreeding or separating into different envirorments for their god to select from. Evolution is craizier than crazy and makes its portonents say the craziest things and cop outs and denials and inconsistentsies.Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2328 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Lets pinpoint another untruth or lie or inconsistency with what you stated Taq....
Evolution does not dictate that all populations must be continually branching off. As long as there is free interbreeding between modern humans we will continue to be the same species. If there are changes over time then we will all change together as long as we all freely interbreed. Lets this time concentrate on your first sentence about CONTINUALLY branching, as you suggest that you can stop your god of evolution from branching out if you so desire, or if she doesnt want new branches forming... Taq, evolution is not a living being, it doesnt have choice and will, it if true (which it isn;t) would be consistent and if branching was true it would always be branching. You can;t turn off your branching just because we are humans and you dont want to admit racism in evolutionary doctrine. Evolution is strictly semantics Mystery solved again and proven again... Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2328 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
First state whether inbreeding is proof of evolution or not.
Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2328 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Thanks Razz, your inability in answering the questions on your dog inbreeding, have further proven that evolution is a racist doctrine.
Inbreeding is not proof of evolution, as you have tried to suggest. By getting you afraid to answer this question or any evolutionist to answer this question, you ALL show that you are afraid to answer because you know MY logic is true. You know that if you say evolution branches, it shows present day racism of different branches in the human population. If you say inbreeding creates a new species as with that demented inbreeding dog chart of Razz, then again it means inbreeding people can create a new KIND, and be present today because of inbreeding. Creationism wins aagin, and racism loses again Inbreeding does not create new kinds of people, they are still people, still humans. Variation does not mean new dogs or new humans evolve via inbreeding. Thats ludicrous and scientifically insane. No this thread is doing well and you have helped prove my point, so keep up the good work Razz, with your lack of answers.... But do return to try and get those inbreeding dogs breeding new generations, in hopes of producing something that is not a dog.Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2328 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Lets get back to the topic
Evolution is a racist doctrine......Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024