The story of Bones and Dogs and Humans

Your first post and original post and GRAPHICS depicts a wolf becoming different dog breeds and then you suggesting that this variation is proof that evolution can jump the gap into new KINDS.Not just a variation of dogs but a new KIND or new species.So Yes you are free to remove your original graphics that suggest and you later suggest proves evolution.No problem simply remove the graphics and edit out your jumping gap proof.Very simple Razz, only would take about three minutes.And then you might also consider choosing another occupation that designer, when you always seem to be against design, and the DESIGNER.But your choice...No I am not lying, its your graph, and your words, and your principles of jumping the gap. But if you choose you can state that INBREEDING IS NOT EVOLUTIONARY CHANGEEdited by Davidjay, : No reason given.

Let me make it easier for you to clarify your mystifying comments and hoped for proofs. Just come out and state Inbreeding proves evolutionary change OR INBREEDING does not prove evolutionary change.Have some courage as it only takes about ten seconds to make up your mind and post clearly..... come on, you can do it. Make up your mind.... and answer this very simple question rather than calling me a liar, and a mis-representer.

Razz, does your inbreeding creat a new species ?If so, then it confirms that inbreeding human populations can creat a new species of humans that is not human but a new KInd ? This confirming that evolution is a racist doctrine.If you deny inbreeding creates a new species, then remove that silly false dog chart that suggests inbred dogs create a new Kind or species.And enough stupid excuses that say this definition or your new definition excuses you and your dogs.

Evasive, elusive, erratic, errant, evolutionists.... can not answer questions because their theory or god is evasive elusive, erratic, and errant.

Talk about a dumb response... Evasive answer and answers, Razz superceeds all other evolutionists in saying nothing and never answering.... What a gutless whimpy reply.. She doesnt say what else is injected into their miracle species creation, just NOT BY ITSELF.....Is that scientific NO, Is that comprehensible NO... Is that an answer NO.Dumber than dumb.Maybe evolutionists want to throw in their god of selection, who knows Razz doesn;t say what else is needed to make inbreeding jump the gap and actually start producing a new species.But insanely for a rational person says, she can not define a species... or KIND so is unable to answer further.IE. Dumb evolutionists have nothing but semantics and no science behind their dumb theory. All they have is name changes, literary classifications, and double speak, and artists imaginations.Yes, evolutionists have great GREAT problems with their lack of evidence and lack of answers. Yet always try to blame those that question them for not understanding their dog pics, and their inbreeding.Inbreeding does not creat new species or KINDS. Its a BIG LIE of evolution and evolutionists.Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.

Scientific sounding jargon doesnt cover up or excuse your lack of straight forward answers.Inbreeding does not produce new kinds...... no matter how long you breed your dogs together.Double speak does not hide, this obvious truth.My belief is correct scientifically and you know it, or should know it, if you studied any biology at all. Your denials show desperation in your lost cause. Inbreeding is not a proof of evolution, but a ploy of evolutionist to con their congregations into their false belief system.