The TRVE history of the Flood...

I was about to post that same image myself. The ultimate point for me, of course, is that moving water lays down strata at whatever rate it is moving.

So I'd see the flume experiments applying to rising sea water too since layers are being deposited with its movement.

It could be that the sea water doesn't deposit the layers simultaneously as we see in the flume (but I'm not sure).

But if the water is rising fast enough to cover the earth to some depth within five months then we are certainly talking about rapid deposition and not millions of years.

The point about superposition is about timing: if the layers are being deposited pretty much simultaneously then the upper is not younger than the lower which is the usual understanding of the principle of superposition.

In any case, in either model, this is very rapid deposition and not slow formation of strata that mark long time periods.

Bacause no one could respond to the delusion of Continental Drift inch by inch versus continental separation after the Floof, we shall deem it confirmed and a principle to be noted and hyperlinked to as a POST FLOOD geological truth.

That should get your layers grinding ....

SEEEarthDividedindaysofPeleg

In His Geological Service

An interesting article, Coyote. Out of those six, which do you think is the best, the strongest, the most unanswerable?

If this is the way the Geo Column was deposited, it would disprove radiometric dating. How? By being right and radiometric dating wrong.

...
First of all, the flood came from the depths of the Earth and covered all mountains included Aararat, and then rushed downwards created the flood plains etc, the Grand Canyon etc etc..... all observed phenonemun not of slow inch by inch, billion years by billion years, but catastrophic events. Again observed by Darwin and Viekosky (Spelling etc.........)

So atheists and evolutionists please FIRST tell us about your inch by inch tetonic plates, and then from your incorrect observations, please do calculate falsely the number of years the continents have been inch by inch separating.

Begin now.

Remember you evolutionists are suppose to be able to debate and prove your theory upon theory, or at least answer questions, besides saying I dont know, evolution doesnt tell us anything about geology, we make it up as we go semantics.

My view is that the high mountains were pushed up after the Flood by the tectonic force that started Continental Drift.

First, shouldn't there be some evidence of subsidence?Subsidence would be a pretty violent physical event wouldn't it? On the order of tectonic violence at least? And if it occurred with each transgression then there ought to be evidence of the most recent, which reaches into the present. Is there any?

Explain your no flood theory, ...

... no castrophic event theory, ...

... your one inch at a time theory.

You must learn how to answer questions, ...

... that is the name of the game, the proof of the pudding, the point of the exercise, the aim of the debate...

Ready set, GO..

PST... evolutionists complain about the race because they never hget out of the starting blocks, and just talk the talk about racing without ever racing or running

It helped a lot for you to explain that the left side represents the center of the continent and the right side the margins (I kept asking myself "center of what?")So that got me as far as understanding that the horizontal dimension represwents the land, or space, and the vertical dimension represents time, but I still have to fight the tendency to see the shape of the water figure as representing the amount of space it covers.So the transgression only covered the center of the continent for a relatively short period of time, covering the rest of the continent out to the margins for progressively longer periods. The rest of the time the dry land was eroding.{It doesn't seem to take into the account the possibility that the center of the continent could be lower and the water could stay there a longer time than at higher elevations? Such as would be the case with the Inland Sea?But I need to think about this more. I still don't really understand it.

It's easy to get caught up in thinking about the Cratonic Sequences in relation to the continental positions as they are now, but in fact, according to Geology for most of the Phanerozoic Eon North America was part of a loosely organized Supercontinent called Rodinia:It looks loosely organized on that illustration anyway, but from what I've read its history isn't yet completely understood. But it is said to have existed throughout the Paleozoic and into the Mesozoic when another Supercontinent formed, known as Pangaea.

Faith posted a one land mass artists representation above, so lets discuss it EVEN though continental drift or land splitting or land dividing into the continents is AFTER the Worldwide FLOOD.
It happened 130 years later in the days of Peleg as stated exactly by the True Geological Record Book.Lets beginEarth Divided in the Days of Peleg
(Continental Drift)(text snipped for the cause of sanity)

Not exactly. The Cratonic Sequences look to me like evidence for the Flood that has been broken up by incidental details that prevent the whole story from coming together. Not intentionally, just because that's how geologists think, so I keep trying to think through the geological information from a floodist perspective. I don't particularly expect to find errors, but in this case it seemed that I did. It's not essential to anything I'm thinking about unless it helps further the Flood interpretation (which it doesn't seem to in this case).(text snipped)

Seeing we are not allowed to talk about the Continental Splitting in the Days of Peleg in a separate topic, allow me as directed to post its truths HERE.
GizaCenterofContinents
Giza is center of One Land MassThe Lord created the heavens and the earth, for He not evolution was the Creator. And it seems Jesus created not the
many separated continents that we see now, but had just one land mass surrounded by water in the Beginning. With only
one continent centered at the Giza co-ordinates, of latitude and longitude, it made the Garden of Eden, East of Giza. (SEE
Location of Eden) SEE also Christos Angle and Petra and Athens.For Here at Giza, the Lord had placed his sockets, His foundation, his granite plateau as the only place on
earth, that would support His Prophecy in Stone, the Great Pyramid. Was this by accident, NO, it was by Design, for it
was meant to last and be a witness to ALL in the Last days Why, because the Great Pyramid was built by the Lord,
using the Lord’s power in His Earth (SEE Levitation by Alignment and Laying on of Hands) and (Enoch built the
Pyramid)And His Prophecy was to show the End Time World that He was COMING again, but this time in POWER. For via a
direct co-relation between the exact linear measurement down and then up the pyramid passageways, it shows major
world events until His Culmination of ALL HISTORY with His 2nd Coming (SEE Great Pyramid Prophecy)For the Great Pyramid was built 100 Years before the Great Flood, of 2348 B.C. (SEE Timeline to Flood) ...and was
able to endure through the Flood and remain on its foundation AFTER the Flood as the center of the whole land mass of
the Earth. Right ? Right !!! And from the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham and Japeth, their lineage traveled overland until the
days of Peleg . . 129 years later. SEE Continental Drift and PelegFor then because of the pride of Man in trying to reach the heavens with his own man made constructions like the
Tower of Babel, (Nimrod) the Lord split up the languages of the earth, as well as splitting up the great one continent of
the Earth. Hence continental drift happened quickly in the Days of Peleg, a descendant of Noah.This is why the continents can now be seen to have fit together as ONE at one time, because literally they were all ONE
in the Beginning. And where was their central point or ”Center of MASS’ of all the land MASS, right where it still
remains today, Right at the Great Pyramid location. For do the research today, The Great Pyramid sits in the center of
the world’s land masses, and sits right on the greatest land mass latitude lengths and longitude lengths of anywhere on
Earth. Why, simple, its because from this central center of mass, the Lord drifted the land masses away from His central
point, keeping the Earth is balance and harmony.This is why the Lord chided Job, when Job thought Heknew so much . .Job 38 : 3 Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I
will demand of thee, and answer thou me.4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the
earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
(Foundations of the earth at Giza)5 Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou
knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? (SEE
The Lord made the distances and Architecture of the
Universe)6 Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or
who laid the corner stone thereof (The four
cornerstones or sockets at Giza on the granite
plateau)7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the
sons of God shouted for joy?8 Or who shut up the sea with doors, when it brake
forth, as if it had issued out of the womb? ( A direct
reference to the doors that opened up from below, that
created the worldwide flood in the days of Noah Genesis 7 : 11).For there is no doubt that the land MASS of the Earth was one continent in the Beginning, and the Great Pyramid’s
center of the world’s land masses today is a further witness of this fact.David Jay JordanPS) And for further proof and a direct connection as to End Time Calamites, consider the fact that the Ring OF FIRE,
which will be exploding in the End Time is exactly on the other side of the Earth from Giza, the center of the Land Mass
of the Earth. This easily explaining the volatility and shallow crusts around the Pacific Ring of Fire, if you consider that
the land masses and plates expanded outward from this central point in Egypt.
(End of article)So again you must study the signifcance of Giza, the Lords prophetic Marker and cornerstone to be able to comprehend more and more truths, step by step til the GREAT STEP, ascending ascending rather than evolutionary descent into the abysss

No comment on my preoccupation with the level of the water eh?

I did keep reading that the sequences are marked by such unconformities but couldn't make sense of it and don't see its significance now either. Yes, those "unconformities" that are the supposed complete absence of a whole layer from the Geological Column, yes, I definitely doubt the presence of those absent layers, yes indeed.

Both of which are imaginary, interestingly enough.

Perhaps you could offer some specific evidence for these?

Where for instance have these unconformities been identified?

Unlikely they all exist in any one geo column, right? So you must have to jump around to locate them.

And what about those "emergent" mountains?

The Rockies did form rather dramatically to the west of the Cretaceous Seaway, but not until after all the strata were laid down as I think of it, ...

... and since your evidence is going to be more imaginary conjurings there's no reason to think it any better than mine.

I think of course of the imaginary mountains Geology has erected from the angular unconformity at the base of the Grand Canyon.

Nothing but airy fantasy but you expect us all to treat Geology as evidenced Science.

I've given more reasonable evidence for the Flood over my time at EvC.