The TRVE history of the Flood...

No as you should know there are 365.24 days in a year. And you have to add, the time of the Flood before Noah stepped out onto dry land, and repopulated the Earth, with His three sons and their wifes, starting the three major races.But yet again we came from the original couple, first Adam and then Noah.Please read Enoch's exact timing in the Book of Enoch.....If you have a brain, a designed brain, and all braqins have been exactly the same since the BEGINNING, no one has a different brain DNA, I repeat we are brethren. We are not disjointed partially mutated half brothers and sisters..... as evolution teaches us. There is zero benefit in stduying luck and choice evolution. No principles , no math.But lets get back to prophecy, MATH and another exact dating of the Great Flood in History

Ummmm. We have evidence, which is more than you have.I posted some evidence upthread twice from my own archaeological projects which by itself disproves the global flood at the "exact" time you are promoting.Why have you ignored that evidence?Or are you just here to push your pet theories, with no effort to actually debate the issue?

Caff... 365.24 days per year divided by 7 days in a week = 52.177142 weeks in a solar year . We then times this by 1656 years and it means 86,405 days.And we have confirmation, when considering Joshuas stopping the rotation for one day and other slight variables, such as the 370 days Noah was in the Ark before recreation started anew.GoogleSo keep that in the back of your mathematical higher vertebrate skulls and ponder the next exact distances and exact corelations with time.Are you ready ?

Seeing we will be now studying the Great Pyramid Prophecy of the Lord, Caff.. I looked up references for you, for the days in a year according to Enoch who was the builder designer of the Great Pyramid of the Lord.GoogleIts not a conspiracy against you, they didn't fudge their numbers and work together with Moses, and translaters to try to get you out of your randomness stuppor. The figures match, so do the math, read about Enoch, and study the Great PYRAMID at Giza, designed by the Lord via Enoch.

Whoops, Joshua stopping the Sun was post Worldwide Flood, it was just after Moses death on Mount Nebo.Got to get things right ?Evolutionists try to within a billion years whereas us creationists try to be much much more exact

So, you have the exact date of the flood that never happened?How about addressing the evidence I posted, or are you just going to continuing on your merry way, ignoring everything that contradicts your mathematical "proof?"

quote:

---

Its now agreed that my math was correct !!! IE that Genesis Bible account with no missing links adds up exactly to 1656 years.

---

No, it is not agreed, because it is not true. I don't know how you can think you can get away with lying like this. The Genesis account does not add up to any exact number of years because it does not give the information necessary.And can you make up your mind please. First you said it was 1646 years from creation to the start of the Flood, then it was 1656 years and now it seems to be 1656 years until Noah left the ark - which is more than a year later than the start. Funny how the "exact" figure keeps changing.

quote:

---

Now STEP 2, is easily confirmed mathematically that there was exactly 84, 400 weeks before Adam set forth on dry ground, this being exactly the number of seconds in a day. 86,400 seconds.

---

No, it is not - you don't have the exact numbers you would need. There is just no way to know the exact number of weeks

quote:

---

In a denying mind this means nothing, as it booggles the unthinking mind that a Creator could be so exact, and DESIGN HISTORY so exactly. At the very least it should make thinking people demand more proofs and want to search more mathematical so called coincidences of time in world HISTORY.

---

Whether the story is in fact history is what you are supposed to be proving - so even if you weren't telling obvious lies you would be begging the question. All you could hope to prove is that the story was carefully designed, something which is within human capability and no use to you at all.So any actual thinking person will tell you to stop wasting time with stupid lies and actually start doing what you said you would do - if you can. (Which is an extraordinarily generous appraisal since you can't)

quote:

---

So lets move on to STEP 3 Confirmation before the Conclusion and wrap up even though there are a multiple of other connections I can give.

---

Is Step 3 going to actual going to offer any valid argument for the Flood or is it going to be another stupid waste of time ? Your step 1 was wrong, your step 2 relied on the erroneous step 1 and could only prove a clever bit of numerology built into the story even if it step 1 was correct.

quote:

---

But already I and we are light years ahead of evolutionists because they have no math, no viable history just theory on theory.

---

Funny how creationists think that they can completely reverse reality.

Coyote, your can have your non-evidence if you like. No problem thats your philosophical choice.But you asked me to enlighten you about the TRUE History or Mathematical proofs about the Great Worldwide Flood of Noah. So as directed by the rules I am following the TOPIC, and enlightening any that do the math and do the research.Its not about you, Coyote, dont feel left out and abandoned.Lets stick to the TOPIC as we move forward... in the mathematical PROOFS of the Great Flood , the Great Destruction as noted by Darwin in the Beagle and the eminent Viekosky.Think Math and exactness and laws and principles Coyote, me thinks you have dropped off too many cliffs chasing Roadrunners.

This is not a science topic, this is some sort of Bible study topic. Indeed, Davidjay has not offered up the slightest scrap of scientific support for "the flood" having happened.Going to move topic to the "Bible Study" forum. The science side follows it there at the own personal risk.Adminnemooseus

Thread copied here from the The TRVE history of the Flood... thread in the Geology and the Great Flood forum.

... which you have not presented ... ... for which you supply no reference ... Who is Viekosky and in what field is he eminent?

This is likely who he means:
Immanuel Velikovsky

You have stated the age of the purported flood, now its our turn to deal with that claim.If we can show there was no flood, as I have done easily from my own archaeological research, then further discussion of how you arrived at that date is useless.You might just as well be polishing the ship's bell on the Titanic for all the use those "proofs" are when the flood itself has been disproved.

It's not really a Bible study topic either... I think we should have a new forum category for all these odd discussions that don't really fit into any existing category well. Maybe call it "non compos mentis" sort of a free-for-all of crazyHBD

Yeah, the archetype of looney tunes. COSMOS WITHOUT GRAVITATION is especially risible.