|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: How do geologist know what they are looking at really is what they say it is? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Good info. Can limestone and similar products can also get incorporated into clastic sediments?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pressie Member (Idle past 204 days) Posts: 2103 From: Pretoria, SA Joined: |
Yes, the Dwyka tillites (Late Carboniferous) towards the south west of Jo'burg consist, amongst others, of clays, sands, gravels and boulders obtained from the underlying Malmani Dolomites of the Transvaal Sequence (Palaeoproterozoic in age).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Thanks.
So let's return to the question asked in Message 42.
quote: So it seems that lithification can produce hard or soft rocks, cemented or compressed rocks, rocks that are compressed and cemented, rocks that can be dissolved by different chemicals and that even within one grouping (mudstones as an example) we can see a vast range of physical characteristics but in every case the resulting product is a direct indicator of how that sample was formed. Is that correct? Next, it also seems that before any sedimentary rocks are formed there must exist the primary (or in many cases secondary or tertiary) sources of material and the earlier materials must first be weathered and eroded and transported to the location where they are found. (Is this the Party to whom I am speaking?)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
Incidentally, can I have a quick question, I think I used to know it but I've forgotten. What do you call a conglomerate/breccia which is made of clasts from a previous conglomerate/breccia?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edge Member (Idle past 1935 days) Posts: 4696 From: Colorado, USA Joined: |
So it seems that lithification can produce hard or soft rocks, cemented or compressed rocks, rocks that are compressed and cemented, rocks that can be dissolved by different chemicals and that even within one grouping (mudstones as an example) we can see a vast range of physical characteristics but in every case the resulting product is a direct indicator of how that sample was formed.
Essentially, yes.
Is that correct? Next, it also seems that before any sedimentary rocks are formed there must exist the primary (or in many cases secondary or tertiary) sources of material and the earlier materials must first be weathered and eroded and transported to the location where they are found. (Is this the Party to whom I am speaking?)
As in clastic rocks, yes. Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Fix 1 quote box.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Can someone explain the mechanisms for formation of a couple of the biological rock types for me?
First limestone. I have heard that limestone can be formed is several ways, by accumulation of shell or coral and by direct precipitation or evaporation. How can geologists tell which process was the primary one in a given sample? What about accumulations of diatoms? What do they produce? The send big question I have is what different types of rocks get produced by buried marshes and wetlands?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edge Member (Idle past 1935 days) Posts: 4696 From: Colorado, USA Joined: |
Can someone explain the mechanisms for formation of a couple of the biological rock types for me?
The short answer is 'from fossils and rock textures'. Fossils are the main clue, but sometimes limestones are so fine-grained that you can't tell without a microscope and even then it's just a matter of naming it by grain size.First limestone. I have heard that limestone can be formed is several ways, by accumulation of shell or coral and by direct precipitation or evaporation. How can geologists tell which process was the primary one in a given sample? Carbonate geology is a whole separate area of the science. If Petrophysics were here, we could get a better idea...
The send big question I have is what different types of rocks get produced by buried marshes and wetlands?
Highly reduced, carbonaceous stuff, like coal ...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
It seems that coal is often found between layers of sandstone or limestone or mudstone or shale. Why is that the case?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member Posts: 16113 Joined: |
'Cos it tended to form in swamps by the shore; it was always just a little variation in sea level away from being in a marine environment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
So it would be another indicator of environments and landscapes changing over time with one landscape being buried and replaced at the surface by a different landscape?
Edited by jar, : there's a "d" in lanscapes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Or, y'know, seascape. But yes, you get coal measures where you can see the same cycle over and over: paleosol (fossil soil) with root traces in it and tree stumps sticking out of it into coal which is then covered over by marine sediment, and then the same sequence over and over again.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
So are there different types of coal and if so what does each type tell us about the source and process that produced the end product?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edge Member (Idle past 1935 days) Posts: 4696 From: Colorado, USA Joined:
|
It seems that coal is often found between layers of sandstone or limestone or mudstone or shale. Why is that the case?
Because the depositional environment is constantly changing, despite what Faith seems to think. What we see is a combination of highly organic swamps with little clastic input (to make nice coal seams) and low gradient streams with overbank deposits (mudstone) and channel deposits (sandstone) and often times, volcanic ash (look up 'tonstein' sometime).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edge Member (Idle past 1935 days) Posts: 4696 From: Colorado, USA Joined:
|
Or, y'know, seascape. But yes, you get coal measures where you can see the same cycle over and over: paleosol (fossil soil) with root traces in it and tree stumps sticking out of it into coal which is then covered over by marine sediment, and then the same sequence over and over again.
In drilling coal fields, you can find three different types of sandstone. There are the sand bars that indicate streams, and there are transgressive beach sands, and regressive beach sands. They all look different in shape and continuity. Here is a huge sand bar overlying a coal seam in New Mexico.
Here is a section of drill core from a thick transgressive sandstone in a coal region which drilled directly through some kind of a shell fossil which is right where one would expect it to be:
Such transgressive sandstones tend to be thicker and with greater continuity across a basin.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edge Member (Idle past 1935 days) Posts: 4696 From: Colorado, USA Joined: |
So are there different types of coal and if so what does each type tell us about the source and process that produced the end product?
Well, that could fill a book. Basically, you've got various grades of coal which reflect the degree of compaction and thermal history (metamorphism). Anthracite is the highest grade of coal.
"As geological processes apply pressure to dead biotic material over time, under suitable conditions, its metamorphic grade increases successively," ... (Coal - Wikipedia) ... from peat to lignite, to bituminous to anthracite and eventually to graphite.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024