Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 57 (9189 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: Michaeladams
Happy Birthday: marc9000
Post Volume: Total: 919,027 Year: 6,284/9,624 Month: 132/240 Week: 75/72 Day: 0/30 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

When Peer Review Fails: Bad Science Papers of the Week

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   When Peer Review Fails: Bad Science Papers of the Week
nwr
Member
Posts: 6481
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 9.7

Normal Thread Display
Message 24 of 27 (779707)
03-07-2016 10:09 AM 		Reply to: Message 22 by NoNukes
03-07-2016 1:14 AM

To be completely honest, provided that the science in the paper is on target, aren't the editorializing comments secondary anyway?
I agree.
​
This seems to be an engineering paper. That is to say, it looks at hand coordination from an engineering perspective. And engineering is a design system.
​
Yes, the language used was unfortunate. But I think the criticism has been a tad excessive.
Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by NoNukes, posted 03-07-2016 1:14 AM NoNukes has seen this message but not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024