|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Jesus and his sacrifice is Satan’s test of man’s morality. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
On that basis we can see that the authors of scripture are attributing their own values to God. Scripture is God-breathed and not written by human opinion. And on THIS basis we can see that YOU are imposing YOUR own values on God and the writers of scripture. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Compensation is one of the ways the principle of an eye for an eye can be applied. It is not the only way. And compensation can be regarded as penal too.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Look Faith. My whole life and world view is based on my Christian faith as a follower of Jesus Christ. Your insistence on my answering the question about why God used His people rather than doing it Himself suggests to me that you are only trying to find an excuse to blame God for something, and blame me as well, because I can't see any purpose in your question and already gave the only answer I have at the moment.
You seem to be interested in following a specific understanding of the Bible that is inconsistent with being a follower of Christ. My faith is in Christ, a typical orthodox faith which I share with millions of others. It's no "specific understanding" of the Bible, it's the understanding of the Reformers for starters. Your beliefs and your Christ are the false ones. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
My commitment is to the God of the Bible He inspired. All your accusations are only going to come back to hurt you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
You have a talent for hallucinating gods in the Bible where I see only one, who identifies Himself as masculine; and the Bible itself is the currently standard sixty-six books. I'm sure your Bible is something else, I'm only describing mine.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Oh politically correct poppycock.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
More semantic poppycock. Allow me to correct my original statement:
Faith writes:
It's the Biblical way. Compensation is one of the ways the principle of an eye for an eye can be applied. Compensation is one of the Biblical ways the principle of an eye for an eye can be applied. That was my context all along.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Perhaps you didn't read the quote in my [Msg=315] which also isn't about taking an eye for an eye; the principle is about the punishment fitting the crime which is perfectly expressed as eye for eye.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Perhaps you misunderstood me? What I thought I was saying was that killing the mothers is already killing the babies.
It was your accusation that I'm like ISIS that I was objecting to, comparing an event in the past with their current murderous outrages.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
I'm sure kbertsche will answer you but
Jesus doesn't refer to what was written in the Hebrew Scriptures as being from God Mat 4:4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
kbertsche writes: Here we see a difference between a believer and an unbeliever. An unbeliever (like you two) will set himself as an authority above God, and will question and judge God at every step. A believer will trust and obey God. Abraham is uniformly praised in Scripture for his faith in God and his willingness to obey whatever God commanded. He did the right thing in obeying God.What would I actually have done if I had been Abraham? I can't be sure. I hope I would have had the faith of Abraham, but I would probably have wondered very seriously whether or not I was hearing God correctly. This is where most of the world's believers have such a problem with you and Faith. As Christians we both believe that we are made in the image of God. We have received the knowledge of the difference between good and evil. We know the difference and we choose between the two. "Most of the world's believers?" I normally don't encounter "believers" who are not inerrantists and don't trust ALL the Bible as God's word unless I go way out of my way. Lots of those here of course but EvC IS way off the path of a Bible believer. Your frame of reference is extremely foreign to me. You do NOT know the difference between good and evil, like everybody else here you are confusing them in many ways.
One of the choices that we make as theists is our understanding of the nature of god and then we choose to follow that god or not. It takes a long time to get an understanding of the nature of God. We are by nature ourselves at "enmity" with the true God. When we become believers we believe enough to have a start in the right direction but that same mental set dogs us until we are well learned in the Bible through hearing preaching and our own reading. Anyone who starts out thinking you understand the nature of God doesn't.
You and I our getting our understanding of the nature of God from two different sources. Mine is from the words and wisdom of Jesus, who I believe perfectly embodied the Word and wisdom of God, and you gain your understanding from an inerrant Bible. The two natures are not compatible. Not according to the large company of Bible inerrantists I'm aware of.
In your statement above you are agreeing that you would hope that you would have the faith to follow through with something evil because God told you to. You are dismissing the whole history of Christianity as evil with that remark. I for one had to hear many sermons on Abraham's call to sacrifice his son before having any reasonable understanding of it. It then becomes a glorious part of the Plan of Redemption that runs through the Old Testament and leads to the revelation of Jesus Christ. Abraham was one of God's most faithful men, whose faith any Christian would want to have. Faith is extremely hard in such a circumstance wouldn't you say? Of course you aren't going to get even that far in thinking it through because you've dismissed God as evil and Abraham as a patsy who can't think for himself. One glaring instance of your inability to tell good from evil.
That is what the followers of ISIS hope that they will have the faith for as well. Another glaring example of the same.
I humbly suggest that you are not following the God of Jesus Christ. You are following a religion that largely came out of the reformation where all of a sudden average people were finally able to access the Bible that had been kept from them for years. For some it became a virtual idol. Ugh. Jesus of course refers to the God of the Old Testament as the Father He is being guided by. But there's no point in trying to persuade you of anything. I just hope you aren't misleading many others.
Things like the crusades were not about spreading Christianity but about gaining power in the same way that ISIS is now. And that's because the Crusades were done by the Antichrist papacy for unchristian reasons.
Christianity is spread by reflecting the love of God into all of creation. Actually it's spread by faithful preaching of the word of God.
The point is not to be a follower of any deity just because you believe that particular deity is god but because you believe that deity is always good and always just. There's really no way to separate the two. I know my God is God and I believe He is always good and just and you are at fault for mposing your own alien standard on Him.
A good and just god does not slaughter innocents. No, a good and just God enacts judgment against NONinnocents, which is what all these examples are about.
If I had to believe that god was genocidal or cruel depending on the circumstances then I won't follow Him. And I don't believe God is "genocidal" because that refers to the killing of innocents; and I know God is not "cruel" because I know Him, I know His word, I know His character and I know that it takes a peculiarly twisted mind to think such things.
Just read the Sermon on the Mount and you can see the various places that Jesus corrects what is written in the OT. Jesus does not follow the god that you follow. Read the following two Biblical quotes. The first is from Deuteronomy 23 and the 2nd from Matthew 5.
quote: quote: Jesus doesn't refer to what was written in the Hebrew Scriptures as being from God. He says simply that "you have heard it said". Jesus did not follow in an inerrant scripture. He then corrects what was written. Rather than succumbing to the evil in the world, with more evil as you are justifying Yahweh of doing, Jesus confronted it head on and went to the cross. God then confirmed Jesus by resurrecting Him. As usual you fail miserably to grasp what Jesus is doing. The first scripture is the instructions to the NATION of Israel as a whole. You can't correct that with instructions to INDIVIDUALS, which is what Jesus is giving. This is an amazingly common misreading. He isn't correcting anything in the Sermon on the Mount anyway, He's showing how deep and exacting the commandments are, in the face of the Pharisees' superficial understanding of them as fulfilled by mere outward behavior/ Also, after the era of individual salvations is over, it will be Jesus Himself who comes as the Avenger, something I'm sure you can't begin to countenance. But I know He is the second person of the Trinity and all three are Jehovah and all three agreed on everything in the OT as well as the NT.
In the hypothetical case of Abraham and his son, I would hope that I would have the faith to protect the life of my son, from an evil god, even at the cost of my own life. The very definition of self-righteousness: me against God. Utter faithlessness. Abraham knew God would save Isaac one way or another but you accuse Him of evil motives.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined:
|
But Faith, it was as wrong then as it is now - Your source? You've consulted the annals of the ancient empires and heathen tribes?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Jesus doesn't refer to what was written in the Hebrew Scriptures as being from God. He says simply that "you have heard it said". Jesus did not follow in an inerrant scripture. This thread isn't about Biblical inerrancy, and as kb just said it would be best if we avoided it, but I've been listening on and off to a conference on that subject and one of the talks was rather entertaining as well as a good answer to your claim: The whole talk is about Jesus' treating the scriptures as inerrant. He makes the assertion clearest at 23:33. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
I was answering the claim that it was wrong then too. I have the impression that it was a normal part of war. I'm not talking about "values" I'm talking about practice.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
God did not "murder" anyone.
So when I said 'wrong' you thought I meant a poor war strategy? No, I thought you didn't know what you were talking about when you said it was "always" wrong because I figured you had no idea whether babies were normally killed in war or not in the ancient world. Can't wait to see what other way you'll manage to twist my meaning.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024