Summations Only

Yeah. One is reviewed, verified and reliable while the other is not.The standards for a scientific institution are quite strict while the standards for a charlatan institute are quite a bit more relaxed. Absent, even.I'm sure you can figure out which one is which without expending too much mental energy, but if you are in doubt, just ask.

Well based on your logic I shouldn't believe you because if you can't even accurately read my links before banging on about head binding, then why would I listen to you?

Would you release precious data to the globalists? Knowing full well that they will either destroy it, claim that it's a fake, discredit the source, or say it's no big deal?

Except that you can't name anywhere I was inaccurate. You said that I hadn't bothered to look at your link when I had. I looked at the headline and the image and saw an obvious example of head binding. I didn't actually read the nonsense in your link until you indicated you were still buying the nonsense hook, line and sinker. So I read it. It's nonsense. Anyone can put words on paper, I proved that earlier with my Magic Crystal Water example. Is your knowledge of the real world really so paltry that you can't tell what fits with what you know and what doesn't?So I ask you again. If a link can't even accurately report about simple things like weight and volume, are you actually going to believe it about parietal bones and mitochondrial DNA? Have you no ability to distinguish between sense and nonsense?--Percy

This is a truly weird view of science.There isn't a scientist on earth that wouldn't give an arm to be the first to scientifically find a new species of human. They'd be famous forevever. Don't you get this? It's the exact opposite of a conspiracy theory cover-up. Scientists absolutely love finding new stuff and proving old stuff wrong - they get prizes for it.And wtf is a globalist?

The 'globalists'? Really?Al, you're just making up stuff, now. Stick to the evidence. What evidence have they provided beyond putting words on paper? How do you know there's a single parietal bone? How do you know the mitochondrial DNA contains 'unknown mutations' that mean it's only distantly related to human beings? This makes sense to you? Get a clue, Al.--Percy

No, there are actual instances of elongated skulls, like there are of intermediate forms and like there aren't of giants.What I would do is ask why you mention them, and why you're getting your "information" about them from a woo-woo site.

The globalists are the people who have all the money and the power (aka the elite). They decide if you get a prize or not, they decide if you get paid or not, they decide if your discovery is worthy or not. Don't you get this?

No, I can't. Please explain in detail how that's a double standard. Dawkins will give you references to the raw data.

Do you know any of their names?They must be really busy if they do all those things.

Globalists are covering up the finding of giants?? But not covering them up well enough to stop them appearing in fake museums run by travel agents?I hesitate to ask why a 'globalist' would do this, normally they're too busy building orbital death rays, but, hey, it's a slow day.

And yet lots of scientists have found new species of humans, and published their work, and won public acclaim, scientific kudos, and more grant money. So if this is the sort of thing the globalist elite is trying to stop, then the globalist elite is really crap at their job.

Why do aliens make crop circles? Why does Jesus appear on tortillas?

So you admit the fossils are genuine? Only the museum is fake but the bones are 100% bona fide.

I think we're all in agreement that there are real deformed skulls. Museums are full of them.