Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Some help for the TC model
joz
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 84 (7635)
03-22-2002 1:04 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Joe Meert
03-22-2002 12:34 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Joe Meert:
a)(2).....Here's a bone for you: Increased spreading such as what you propose would generate significant continental flooding without the need for any extra water.
b)(6)How long does it take to relax the thermal anomaly generated by the decreased viscosity (if that is the cause)? Express this answer quantitatively.

a)What causes the flooding? Only thing I can think of is the bow waves thrown up by the continents as they steam around at speeds in the miles per hour range, but that would probably cause tsunamis instead of floods per se.....
b)Doesn`t the thermal anomaly cause the reduced viscosity? If not what does? If the decrease in viscosity is due to the anomalous temperatures how can the decreased viscosity cause the thermal anomaly?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Joe Meert, posted 03-22-2002 12:34 PM Joe Meert has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Joe Meert, posted 03-22-2002 1:32 PM joz has not replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 84 (7676)
03-22-2002 9:47 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Joe Meert
03-22-2002 8:27 PM


Hey Joe any chance of providing definitions of the terms in that equation for us thickies who don`t have access to a decent library?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Joe Meert, posted 03-22-2002 8:27 PM Joe Meert has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Joe Meert, posted 03-22-2002 10:19 PM joz has replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 84 (7678)
03-22-2002 10:51 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Joe Meert
03-22-2002 10:19 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Joe Meert:
1)t=average age of subducted crust
2)T0=surface temperature, nominally taken as zero
3)k=diffusivity term

1)t or tau is average age? Theres an integral involving dt so t being a constant seems odd....
2)Does it matter what temperature range you use? I`m guessing its not Kelvin if its normally aproximated to zero....
So is it Centigrade?
(sorry about that second one but certain equations like L = sigmaT4 give funny results if you use the wrong scale....)
3)Oh thats nice.... Um Joe (insert embaressed looking smilie here) what is the diffusion constant? Is it a constant or a function of something else? Sorry i have to keep asking like this....
4)Ummmm.... What is the alphav....
[This message has been edited by joz, 03-22-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Joe Meert, posted 03-22-2002 10:19 PM Joe Meert has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Joe Meert, posted 03-22-2002 11:52 PM joz has replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 84 (7744)
03-24-2002 10:09 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Joe Meert
03-22-2002 11:52 PM


[QUOTE]Originally posted by Joe Meert:
[B]1)JM:Average age; however, it falls out of the integration; note the 1/tau term outside the integral will factor into the integration because the integration is done from 0 to tau.
2)JM: kappa=K/pc ....It has units of length^2/time, but the K (thermal conductivity) tells you its related to how far/fast heat diffuses. Does that help? It is not a constant (hint: this is a term that will cause TC fits when he starts to model).
[B][/QUOTE]
1)Sorry I`m still not getting how t is average age instead of tau....
Could you work through a brief example for me please?
2)Hmmm k[Kg.m/K.s3] so to end up with Kappa [m2/s] pc needs units [Kg/K.m.s2]...
Ok i`ll bite Joe what is pc?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Joe Meert, posted 03-22-2002 11:52 PM Joe Meert has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Joe Meert, posted 03-24-2002 10:48 PM joz has replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 19 of 84 (7760)
03-25-2002 12:39 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Joe Meert
03-24-2002 10:48 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Joe Meert:
1)JM: Tau, is average age. Sorry, thought that was clear. During integration, the solution is
2/3t3/2 evaluated from 0 to tau. the final expression looks the same as I gave earlier except the integral is removed and the expression is multiplied by 1/tau (means the final tau is tau1/2 and the constant is 4/3.
2)pc= is actually rho* c....Rho=density and has units of kg/m3. c is specific heat and has units of Joules/kg*C. Now, to anticipate your next question, joules are kg*m2/s2....cancelling all you get
kappa = kg*m2 * m3 * sec2*oC / m * oC * sec3*kg*m2
if i've copied this correctly, you get kappa= m2/sec

1)Okey doke... If tau`s average age it makes sense it was the confusion over whether it (average age) was t or tau that got me....
2)I was thinking p might be a rho but I figured it would be easier to ask.....
Sorry about all the pesky details Joe....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Joe Meert, posted 03-24-2002 10:48 PM Joe Meert has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Joe Meert, posted 03-25-2002 12:41 AM joz has replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 84 (7766)
03-25-2002 1:02 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by Joe Meert
03-25-2002 12:41 AM


Ok so the units of alpav are [K-1]?
If so I think I understand the equation....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Joe Meert, posted 03-25-2002 12:41 AM Joe Meert has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Joe Meert, posted 03-25-2002 1:14 AM joz has not replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 84 (8873)
04-24-2002 1:17 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Joe Meert
04-24-2002 1:07 PM


You`re a cruel man Joe, making him do all this work to falsify his own hypothesis....
Oh and TC you want to use S.I units....
(I hope his "collage (sic) level" physics includes S.I units....)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Joe Meert, posted 04-24-2002 1:07 PM Joe Meert has not replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 54 of 84 (9166)
05-02-2002 11:18 AM
Reply to: Message 50 by TrueCreation
04-24-2002 6:03 PM


quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
Hm.. well I guess you missunderstood my post, I am not questioning the physics, but the way variables should be expressed such as my example of meters, feet, kilometers, centegrade, kalvin, etc. Do you see what I am getting at? I had just looked over your paper at http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/jmeert/oceans.htm, I found that you answer my questions at your reference 7 as to the form of expression. Though Velocity, what unit of measure should be used, the same for age, mantle temp, average age of subducted crust, and at what depth is mantle density taken at?
Already told you TC use SI units....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by TrueCreation, posted 04-24-2002 6:03 PM TrueCreation has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Joe Meert, posted 05-02-2002 11:34 AM joz has not replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 63 of 84 (9471)
05-10-2002 12:00 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by Joe Meert
05-09-2002 9:10 AM


TC do the work or admit defeat...
I am getting tired (and I am sure Joe is as well) of your endless prevarication....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Joe Meert, posted 05-09-2002 9:10 AM Joe Meert has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by TrueCreation, posted 05-11-2002 7:21 PM joz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024