Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Atheists can't hold office in the USA?
Jon
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 660 of 777 (750799)
02-22-2015 5:04 PM
Reply to: Message 658 by ringo
02-22-2015 2:53 PM


Re: Fresh meat. :-)
Whatever fundamentalist Christians think of their god, it has nothing to do with the YHWH character from the books of the Old Testament.

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 658 by ringo, posted 02-22-2015 2:53 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 667 by ringo, posted 02-23-2015 10:41 AM Jon has replied

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 663 of 777 (750806)
02-22-2015 5:48 PM
Reply to: Message 661 by Tangle
02-22-2015 5:37 PM


Re: reference back to the topic as outlined in message 1 ...
Nah. I'm content just pointing out the weasels; I don't really care to wrestle 'em.

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 661 by Tangle, posted 02-22-2015 5:37 PM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 664 by Tangle, posted 02-23-2015 2:29 AM Jon has replied

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 669 of 777 (750863)
02-23-2015 12:17 PM
Reply to: Message 667 by ringo
02-23-2015 10:41 AM


Re: Fresh meat. :-)
You're quibbling over spelling? YHWH = Jehovah, whether fundies know it or not. And they know the character, whether they know the spelling variations or not.
They know nothing of the character. They've never read the stories.
You're giving them way too much credit.
Edited by Jon, : No reason given.

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 667 by ringo, posted 02-23-2015 10:41 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 670 by ringo, posted 02-23-2015 12:35 PM Jon has replied

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 671 of 777 (750869)
02-23-2015 1:14 PM
Reply to: Message 670 by ringo
02-23-2015 12:35 PM


Re: Fresh meat. :-)
What opponent?
As far as I can tell, fundamentalist Christian participation in this thread has been minimal and there hasn't been any at all for the last several pages or so.

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 670 by ringo, posted 02-23-2015 12:35 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 686 by ringo, posted 02-24-2015 10:44 AM Jon has not replied

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 674 of 777 (750886)
02-23-2015 8:35 PM
Reply to: Message 673 by Straggler
02-23-2015 5:20 PM


Re: and ANOTHER opportunity for Tangle to review his position ...
The definition Tangle is using
Which one?

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 673 by Straggler, posted 02-23-2015 5:20 PM Straggler has not replied

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 680 of 777 (750908)
02-24-2015 9:37 AM
Reply to: Message 664 by Tangle
02-23-2015 2:29 AM


Re: reference back to the topic as outlined in message 1 ...
Likewise, sir.

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 664 by Tangle, posted 02-23-2015 2:29 AM Tangle has not replied

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 683 of 777 (750912)
02-24-2015 10:17 AM
Reply to: Message 681 by Straggler
02-24-2015 9:54 AM


Re: and ANOTHER opportunity for Tangle to review his position ...
You're so ridiculous it's hilarious.
Edited by Jon, : No reason given.

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 681 by Straggler, posted 02-24-2015 9:54 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 684 by Straggler, posted 02-24-2015 10:22 AM Jon has replied

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 685 of 777 (750915)
02-24-2015 10:31 AM
Reply to: Message 684 by Straggler
02-24-2015 10:22 AM


Re: and ANOTHER opportunity for Tangle to review his position ...
The only thing more ridiculous than the fool are the bigger fools that follow him.

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 684 by Straggler, posted 02-24-2015 10:22 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 692 by Straggler, posted 02-24-2015 12:36 PM Jon has seen this message but not replied

  
Jon
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 722 of 777 (751015)
02-25-2015 8:00 PM
Reply to: Message 708 by dronestar
02-25-2015 10:46 AM


Re: It's natural to be a naturalist . . .
So, even though it still has problems, does anybody concede that the term "naturalist" is the best term to use?
I consider myself a naturalist; in fact, I consider myself a right empiricist. I also consider myself an agnostic. And I consider myself a theist.
I don't think co-opting words that have other uses really solves the problem of people being hardcore definition nazis.
It'd be better if those people would simply be reasonable, honest, and understanding.
The second best option is to simply ignore their nonsense and give it none of the attention only good arguments deserve.

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 708 by dronestar, posted 02-25-2015 10:46 AM dronestar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024