Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Homosexuality and Evo, Creo, and ID
Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 384 of 1309 (727565)
05-19-2014 5:07 AM
Reply to: Message 378 by Faith
05-19-2014 3:59 AM


Re: You knew sinners bought cakes when you baked them.
It not designed to hate Christians. It's to stop Christians victimising innocent people. Like we can't victimise black people.
Christians want to treat gay people differently to to straight people. If you act in a way that is against the law you reap what you sow.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 378 by Faith, posted 05-19-2014 3:59 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 385 by Faith, posted 05-19-2014 5:16 AM Larni has replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 396 of 1309 (727577)
05-19-2014 7:07 AM
Reply to: Message 385 by Faith
05-19-2014 5:16 AM


Re: You knew sinners bought cakes when you baked them.
How is treating people equally evil?
Ordering genocide is evil (unless your god does it, I guess). If having to treat all people the same is evil then a reasonable conclusion would be that your views about what is evil is certainly not normal.
All the best.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 385 by Faith, posted 05-19-2014 5:16 AM Faith has not replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 415 of 1309 (727773)
05-20-2014 2:39 PM
Reply to: Message 411 by Faith
05-20-2014 2:23 PM


I guess that would make you the same as a conscientious objector. They were happy to go to jail for their convictions.
Enjoy jail, I guess.
Oh wait, first you need to buy a bakery and refuse to sell bread to those no good queers. Or go an a mass protest (like Operation American Spring) and get into a fight with a copper. Or picket a gay wedding and hurl rocks at the happy couple.
If you can find some way of avoiding doing these things you should be safe.
Hold on, Obama might have a Christian thought detector: better get that tinfoil hat as stay out of jail.
And for God's sake DON'T PLAY MONOPOLY!
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 411 by Faith, posted 05-20-2014 2:23 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 416 by Faith, posted 05-20-2014 2:42 PM Larni has replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 417 of 1309 (727777)
05-20-2014 2:49 PM
Reply to: Message 416 by Faith
05-20-2014 2:42 PM


Preachers will go next. Then maybe I will too because I'm a blogger and this is one of my topics.
Don't be silly, no body has 'gone'. Unless it was the 10-30 million Christian Republican patriots 'vanished' by Obama before Operation American Spring took place.
Maybe you should be worried.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 416 by Faith, posted 05-20-2014 2:42 PM Faith has not replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 419 of 1309 (727781)
05-20-2014 2:59 PM
Reply to: Message 418 by Faith
05-20-2014 2:49 PM


Re: sexual aberrations
It's not those no good queers doing this, it's politicians and the people who vote for them.
Your position and ideology is that a moral dinosaur; looking up to the heavens as the first shower of meteorites begins to fall.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 418 by Faith, posted 05-20-2014 2:49 PM Faith has not replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 425 of 1309 (727788)
05-20-2014 3:22 PM
Reply to: Message 424 by Faith
05-20-2014 3:18 PM


Re: equal rights, not just a good idea
That is a lie. Homosexuals have had complete freedom for decades
They have not had complete freedom to get married, have they?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 424 by Faith, posted 05-20-2014 3:18 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 429 by Faith, posted 05-20-2014 4:08 PM Larni has replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 433 of 1309 (727799)
05-20-2014 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 429 by Faith
05-20-2014 4:08 PM


Re: equal rights, not just a good idea
Marriage is for heterosexuals
Not now.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 429 by Faith, posted 05-20-2014 4:08 PM Faith has not replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 436 of 1309 (727802)
05-20-2014 4:15 PM
Reply to: Message 435 by Diomedes
05-20-2014 4:12 PM


Re: equal rights, not just a good idea
Your persecution complex is not only unwarranted but demonstrably false. Ironically, not unlike your scientific views.
Not true. To a Christian persecution is a blessing from Jesus.
Matthew 5:10 Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Matthew 5:11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.
Matthew 5:44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Matthew 10:22 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved.
Matthew 24:9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake.
Matthew had a real boner for persecution.
Edited by Larni, : Matthew's boner

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 435 by Diomedes, posted 05-20-2014 4:12 PM Diomedes has not replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 439 of 1309 (727808)
05-20-2014 4:26 PM
Reply to: Message 437 by Faith
05-20-2014 4:23 PM


You are allowed to object. You are objecting here and no one has busted down your door to frog march you the prison.
Object and protest (like Westboro Baptist do), but you can't break the law.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 437 by Faith, posted 05-20-2014 4:23 PM Faith has not replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 442 of 1309 (727811)
05-20-2014 4:37 PM
Reply to: Message 441 by Faith
05-20-2014 4:30 PM


Faith I love you but you really are bonkers.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 441 by Faith, posted 05-20-2014 4:30 PM Faith has not replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 454 of 1309 (727835)
05-21-2014 3:46 AM
Reply to: Message 452 by Faith
05-20-2014 10:29 PM


Re: evidence
Did you know how much the couple where find for refusing to serve those no good lesbians? Bearing in mind the Fox News link says 'likely to face hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines (as opposed to what they were fined?).
That's right: nothing. They were fined nothing.
AN alternative to fearmongering

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 452 by Faith, posted 05-20-2014 10:29 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 455 by Faith, posted 05-21-2014 4:21 AM Larni has not replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 465 of 1309 (727847)
05-21-2014 5:45 AM
Reply to: Message 463 by Faith
05-21-2014 5:22 AM


Re: evidence
How would you feel if a restaurant refused to serve you because they knew you were Christian?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 463 by Faith, posted 05-21-2014 5:22 AM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 467 by frako, posted 05-21-2014 6:02 AM Larni has not replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 466 of 1309 (727848)
05-21-2014 5:52 AM
Reply to: Message 462 by Faith
05-21-2014 5:19 AM


Re: evidence
Not true. Only about 5 thousand were killed during the inquisition.
Inquisition death toll

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 462 by Faith, posted 05-21-2014 5:19 AM Faith has not replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(3)
Message 471 of 1309 (727854)
05-21-2014 8:21 AM
Reply to: Message 470 by Straggler
05-21-2014 7:25 AM


Re: evidence
To be fair we don't know if the dogs are a gay couple or not.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 470 by Straggler, posted 05-21-2014 7:25 AM Straggler has not replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 474 of 1309 (727858)
05-21-2014 9:11 AM
Reply to: Message 472 by Theodoric
05-21-2014 8:53 AM


Re: evidence
What pastors were arrested for preaching against homosexuality? Please show evidence of this.
I seem to remember the Phelps clan had some good Christian view they were sometimes known to share.
Were they arrested for exercising their freedom of speach, Faith?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 472 by Theodoric, posted 05-21-2014 8:53 AM Theodoric has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024