These two statements do not carry equal weight.
The ToE says All life was descended from earlier life.
I have been presenting, albeit in bits and pieces, what should be considered to be at least a creationist model in the making.
The first has 150 years of research, testing and development and is corroborated by several scientific disciplines - including the non-biological sciences - and contradicted by none. It is accepted by all scientific establishments regardless of country or religious belief. It's also accepted by the vast majority of Christians globally.
The second is your own personal opinion based on the disparate views of a group of fundamental Christians who can't agree amongst themselves what their actual 'model' is.
Is there any point in continuing to state and restate these obvious opinions
Definitely; the claims of fanatics must always be met head on and dealt with wherever and whenever they arise.
Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.