|
Author
|
Topic: hello from messenjah of one
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 2 of 35 (716753)
01-21-2014 4:03 AM
|
Reply to: Message 1 by Trump won
01-21-2014 12:03 AM
|
|
Hi. When you say neglecting the spiritual, exactly what do you mean when you use the word 'spiritual'? Do you have a working definition? All the best.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1 by Trump won, posted 01-21-2014 12:03 AM | | Trump won has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 17 of 35 (716873)
01-22-2014 3:32 AM
|
Reply to: Message 12 by Trump won
01-21-2014 8:44 PM
|
|
So, magical thinking, then? If not, why not? All the best.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 12 by Trump won, posted 01-21-2014 8:44 PM | | Trump won has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 18 of 35 (716874)
01-22-2014 3:34 AM
|
Reply to: Message 14 by Trump won
01-21-2014 10:23 PM
|
|
i'm not a robot destined to die in the ground and the dust of myself is dust but my soul lives eternally and is internally recognized by Christ's death and intuition reveals his selfhood to be true as a living parasitic organism in my heart dictating my moves and ideas and actions and thoughts and sins and forgiveness in the world What evidence do you have to support this assertion? All the best.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 14 by Trump won, posted 01-21-2014 10:23 PM | | Trump won has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 23 of 35 (716920)
01-22-2014 3:15 PM
|
Reply to: Message 22 by ringo
01-22-2014 12:25 PM
|
|
I was a bit of an idiot at 25. I hope I'm less so now, but who can tell?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 22 by ringo, posted 01-22-2014 12:25 PM | | ringo has seen this message but not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 27 of 35 (716999)
01-23-2014 6:22 AM
|
Reply to: Message 24 by Trump won
01-22-2014 9:53 PM
|
|
What evidence do you have for this assertion?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 24 by Trump won, posted 01-22-2014 9:53 PM | | Trump won has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 32 of 35 (717064)
01-23-2014 5:44 PM
|
Reply to: Message 26 by Phat
01-23-2014 12:23 AM
|
|
Re: Choice
It is if you want to increase the chance that your decision will be rational.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 26 by Phat, posted 01-23-2014 12:23 AM | | Phat has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 34 of 35 (717086)
01-24-2014 3:35 AM
|
Reply to: Message 33 by Trump won
01-24-2014 1:26 AM
|
|
How is that evidence? I asked how Jesus could know if I were an idiot: you then saying that the phrase 'let there be light' is evidence for this assertion does not follow. Unless you are trying to be sophomoric. All the best.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 33 by Trump won, posted 01-24-2014 1:26 AM | | Trump won has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2
