By Golly, Benghazi

quote:

---

it interferes with the depiction that the administration is trying to convey that al Qaeda is on the wane

---

How does an attack by a group that isn't al Qaeda interfere with the depiction that al Qaeda is on the wane?Is there anything to support that accusation, apart from the weasel worded and unsupported claim that "some of whom were at least sympathetic to al Qaeda"?Nope. Thought not.
Just more hate-filled and ignorant hyperbole. It's hard to tell from here; are you wearing your tin-foil hat?

...says the idiot that didn't notice my quote was between quote lines. You will continue to get what you deserve.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

And I am correct.
Want to go back and look at your anti-BBC thread? How's that panning out for ya?I am also the man that says you are too dishonest to admit your mistakes.
And I am the man that says you are a conspiracy nut with little to no integrity.Perhaps your reply would have been more effective if you had proved me wrong rather than simply identifying my gender.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

It is because I judge your posts on their actual content and not just on your posting history.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

I get plenty of sex!
And sometimes with another person.