looking for good books

Actually, the questions have probably already been answered. There hasn't been a really new one for awhile.You might also warn her not to jump in with assertions from her creationist sources until she's read what has already been posted.

Well, , mostly. Many of us have seen quite a bit of this. We are always in danger of seeing the same stuff appear and make a lot of assumptions about the person posting. It is naughty but hard to resist.Even the "I just want to understand" approach has been used a number of times. They are almost always disingenuous and it quickly gets into "evo-slaying". So we might all be a little gun shy and make wrong assumptions.All of that's one reason why I suggested she be very careful in using AiG or ICR material. It has already been beat on and seeing it again just tends to get the clubs out almost instantly.

Isn't it a bad idea to mix all this apparent attacking of the new testement in with trying to fight the bogus science ideas of the creationists. I know that the NT has a lot of problems if you try to take it as literal and inerrant but is it necessary to upset someone by pointing that out if you don't have to?

Welcome to the forum!Anyone who likes the Good Doctor can't be all bad, no matter what side of the debate you are on.