|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,483 Year: 3,740/9,624 Month: 611/974 Week: 224/276 Day: 64/34 Hour: 1/2 |
Summations Only | Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 3855 days) Posts: 390 From: Irvine, CA, United States Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Does the universe have total net energy of zero? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
Calling into question those who have gone before is, at least in part, what science does. Yeah, but not at random.
The fact you have the faith to accept the claim (third or fourth hand) that the energy of empty space is infinite or greater than the energy of U-238 of the same volume is... well... you have more faith than a scientist should ever have. Hooah didn't say he accepted Feynman's claim: he said that if you're going to claim that Feynman was wrong you should provide some sort of reasoning or math rather than just the gut feeling ("that seems a bit much to me") of someone who is, in matters of physics, a simpleton whose views have consistently been ill-informed nonsense.
Regarding actual calculations, we will have to wait until we see some from those claiming the net energy is zero. These have already been provided and ignored, presumably because you find it easier to bullshit in English than in math. Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given. Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
This is correct, but the pseudotensor approach does not do this. The pseudotensor approach works exactly the same way after the discovery of dark energy as it did before. That is simply not tenable to me. For reasons that you may or may not one day be able coherently to explain. The pseudotensor calculations start with Einstein's equations. Hence they hold whatever the stress energy tensor is and so for any universe satisfying the equations. Discovering the existence of dark energy doesn't change that any more than discovering the thirteenth moon of Jupiter, they're both just one more thing in a universe which is still described by General Relativity. Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
If you don't know anything about physics, you shouldn't post about it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
The loon is not addressing the topic.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
It's been on topic from the start, had you even bother to read what plasma is you would realize it is an electrified medium. Since electric currents exist everywhere, including your brain (although some could argue that and I wouldn't have a defense in your case) it is impossible for the universe to be electrically neutral. Especially if we consider that there is NO gravitational model for the atom, only electrical. So what holds atoms together and by extension you if no electricity is allowed? You can't get better until you realize that you have a problem.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
What was that about water and evaporation???? ShieldSquare Captcha PlasmaAir AG - Saubere Luft ist unsere Herausforderung PlasmaAir AG plasma is involved in steam as well. My God you're stupid.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Where have you measured this overall charge but "localized"? And everywhere you measure it, it is anything but neutral! Forbidden - Stack Exchange Voltage has no set strength, only relative to something else, which conversely means that no matter what you measure it has voltage, just more or less to whatever you pick as your starting value. A voltage of zero is zero no matter what your units of measurement.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
I wonder what you think "order of magnitude" means ... ?
But you were lecturing us about science, do go on.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
That is not a theory.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Says who, you? Yeah. 'Cos it's not a theory. It's vacuous hand-waving.
But I apologize, you are correct. it isn't a theory, it's a paradigm. "Paradigm" is what cranks call their half-baked ideas.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
And if your solar theory and cosmological theory is correct, why does everything surprise you? Every result since the space age has come as a surprise to you, why? Does not your theories predict anything correctly? 404 Page not found - The Daily Galaxy Error 404 (Not Found)!!1... http://www.floridatoday.com/...-universe-s-largest-structure http://beforeitsnews.com/...tronomers-surprised-2398338.html http://news.oneindia.in/...rprised-by-suns-constantsize.html Astronomers Surprised by Unnatural Star Cluster | The Institute for Creation Research Answers - The Most Trusted Place for Answering Life's Questions http://www.todayszaman.com/newsDetail_getNewsById.action?... Imperial College London Shall I list 2 or 3 thousand more? No, you've made your point. Now show us ten corresponding links where each of these observations was predicted, before it was made, by your quaint little sect of cranks. No? OK, then all these things came as a surprise to you too.
And yet you are going to claim that a paradigm that has predicted every discovery about the sun and solar system and galaxies is wrong. Only for some reason you are unable to find any of these predictions you boast of, what a shame.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Your hypothesis. Do you understand the difference? It's not a hypothesis either.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
So then what moved in the 0 volume of the initial event, if the beginning energy was equal, all in one spot? Was I not told earlier that this was a valid thought experiment Not that I am opposed to the idea of a singularity, as in singular - ity. schwarzschild's equation admits to that mathematical possibility, but only when it is alone in a universe devoid of all other matter. The equations for two or more such masses has never been solved in relativity. This is the ONLY reason the Big Bang theory could even hold any merit whatsoever. So if all of the universe was condensed into a zero-point volume mass, where all charges would balance each other, then there is no reason for the Big Bang to have occurred, since energy cannot be destroyed and all in existence is the same as it was initially. So yes, I quite disagree that it sums to 0. Or we can have it their way and no such event occurred, as I said, am not too fond of that theory anyways. But even though its not perfect, as I said, it's better than the alternative. My theory won't fall just because the universe may be eternal and overall unchanging, not small and expanding, the exact opposite of neutrality, as if all is balanced, why start expansion in the first place? This is ignorant gibberish. Why don't you learn some physics?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Only gibberish when it goes against you? Others were using it to try to prove your point, you didn't seem to object then, so you have no valid objection now. Or are you saying they were incorrect too? You are delusional: no-one was trying to use your gibberish to prove my point. Try to be a little less crazy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
All I have to say is this, you leave me speechless with your knowledge, yet say nothing. Ad hominem - Wikipedia Apparently being speechless is something else you don't know how to do.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024