|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Did Dinosaurs live with man? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3997 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
Aren't you implying picking out the real science from the unreal is your strong suit, Doc? And that you can give good guidance to the ignorant mog? Could you draw a picture of real science? Who are the real scientists in your picture? Isn't it Hawk and Dawk? And Krauss the Mouse is for sure not unreal? What about Palsy Measly and Small Coyne in the Loin? Should the Cheshire trust those more than the Steady Freddy playing Harp to the superluminal dancing quasars? And what about the quasiskeptical Mickey Mouse Shermer and his army of doubting clones? Should the cat be sceptical about all that mouse is sceptical about and have faith in all it is so unhappy to see being denied? The cat heard the "skeptic" is planning to write a new book entitled "The danger of Black Holes denial". Should he hurry to purchase the learned tome as soon as it comes out, Inadequate?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3997 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
I hope you've sobered up enough, Hooey, and are ready to continue investigating the issue of dragons and dinosaurs. There is a serious controversy about that curious issue, both interested sides have very heavy agendas and neither is to be trusted entirely. It would be very good to see those without such agendas, biases and preconceptions taking it up and re-examining the whole thing thoroughly.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3997 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
The problem with you lot is that you only worry too much about the bible-pushers and don't care to understand anything. You have no time for understanding left as you spend all of it trying to assassinate the pushers character. Do you worry the bible-peddlers might steal your customers or what, Inadequate?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3997 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
You've done a nice quotation job, Inadequate. What do you reckon about Acambaro figurines the cat is investigating right now? Are they a fraud in your opinion? Do you reckon that the genius peasant produced all 33 400 of them? Perry Mason took up the case, found they were genuine depictions of the dragons interacting with simians and he found you are a fraud too. Are you going to sue him and Gardner?
Edited by Alfred Maddenstein, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3997 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
Don't worry about my medication, Inadequate. The cat is taking care of me. He will skin me up a good one in a short while.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3997 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
What a jerk you are, Inadequate, on top of being such a phoney. Did you examine the case personally and on the scene like Gardner did? The cat read his meticulous account of the fishy business. There are still 20 000 figurines extant out 37 000 something originally found. The rest are lost due to jerks like yourself. The figurines are in many different styles. The artist hoaxer must have been versatile indeed. You say the workmanship is poor? Then you can easily make a few like that for the moggy? When finished send them to the Cheshire by special delivery. You quackademic idiot reckon without the cat being well versed in Spanish and reading the Mexican sources of the affair. The police and local archaeologists' reports and stuff. The same goes for Turkmenistan dragon with human tracks. There are original pre-perestroika Russian journalistic and scientific accounts to be found that the Cheshire has no trouble deciphering. Your case is getting weaker and weaker. The bible-pushers have a good motive to defraud but your sect have an excellent one to lie through their baboonish teeth too. The jury is well out.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3997 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
If the figurines are genuine, they alone are enough to put a nuclear winter on your whole dogma, Coy Boy. Yet they are but a single such funny bit of information out of very many.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3997 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
Who's talking..Inadequate? Your whole argument so far boils down to insinuations of how mad is the cat and how sane and trustworthy a doc you happen to believe yourself to be. Accompanied by thumping on the baboonish breast and patting Coy Boy's baboonish back.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3997 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
Again, you worry too much about the bible peddlers. If it is established that all you believe in in general and the part about the dragons in particular is sheer quackademic nonsense, that would not necessarily mean that the case of the bible-pushers is made and you need to switch your allegiance to Noah's ark and the rest of the flooding punishment for your baboonish sins and stuff. It only would mean that your dogma is falsified in the Popperian sense. Do you honour Popper, Coy Boy? Just be a good boy, admit you ain't got a remotest clue about nothing and go back to the drawing board and places where clues and stuff could be found. Otherwise being a creationist yourself your calling the bible-pushers and gospel peddlers creationists impresses nobody. Remember, the big bunk creation you believe in while parroting the Hawk, Krauss the Mouse and other venerable quacks is no less laughable than what the bible folks propose. No difference, sorry to disappoint you, Coy Boy.
Edited by Alfred Maddenstein, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3997 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
No, no, no Vatican, you are trying to smuggle your religion for a free ride here insinuating to the gullible that because the modern technology self-evidently works and the technology is associated with science anything labelled by the priests and politicians as science must be swallowed without demur. Irrelevant as whatever works would be working just the same without such ridiculous ideologies as bigbangism, neo-darwinism, feminism or climatism labelled as science by popular consent. That is a trick the feline is well familiar with. Performing the trick grants your bollocks their well deserved cutting by the Cheshire with the consequent ramming deep down your devious throat for you to chew and choke at leisure. From the fact that a computer works as it does or surgeons operate as they do may not automatically follow that the whole world can possibly be compressed to occupy the volume less than a pea while embedded in nothing to inflate into. Or that non-living objects can meet by chance to result in a death-dodging machine like you or a cell to randomly mutate into all other forms. The modern technology is not dependent at all on modern myths and mass ideologies propagated by the priestly quacks. Understand?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3997 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
Sorry, Coy Boy, if I missed somehow the truckloads of evidence you've got it all down pat allegedly posted. There have been loads of ad hominids and insinuations hurled at the cat but that is only evidence that you lot have got very little to say of any substance on the issue and in general defence of your creationist beliefs. You are just not interested in anything other than giving and maintaining the impression the beliefs are gospel truth set in stone at all costs. That quackademic lack of interest is a shame. Take those Ica Stones and the Acambaro statuettes that the Cheshire investigated. His preliminary conclusion is that in both cases some of them are genuine and some may be fake. Which are fakes and which are not, what exactly the genuine ones were depicting or what exactly was copied in the fakes and so on is hard to establish as no thorough investigation has ever been conducted in either case. The alleged fakers were never even interrogated properly as faking the artefacts was not a crime in either state nor was it a crime against the official archaeological time-line. The quackademics had reached their conclusions before hand being interested only in knowing it all already. If not for the bible-pushers both cases would have been buried completely. The peddlers must be thanked for drawing attention to such matters even though they may have a heavy agenda of their own. You lot, on the other hand, are a total waste of the space occupied by yourselves.
Edited by Alfred Maddenstein, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3997 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
Science works, whatever works is science is a tautology, silly Vatican. Like the working natural selection and so on. The dead tend to reproduce less than the living kind of stuff. The cat dealt with your particular bollocks so what are you unhappy about?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3997 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
No, no, no, again, Vatican. You again are trying to promote your religion by association with whatever may work. The two are not the same no matter how much you'd love the cat to believe otherwise and swallow under that guise any quackademic pronouncement you bigbanger creationist lot hold for gospel truth set forever in stone. That won't wash here with the feline. The buck stops here so you won't sell any of your creationist snake-oil to the moggy. The cat neither believes nor disbelieves in dragons. The issue discussed here is whether the dragons and dinosaurs are the same phenomenon and the issue is how, when and if they all became extinct and it is clearly far from being any settled science. Understand?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3997 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
Listen, Coy Boy, there is a whole host of other issues associated with dragons discussed here you lot would dearly love to bury under your cheap jokes. It's been twenty years since the Egyptian mummies been busted smoking tobacco and getting high on South American cocaine. How that was possible? It is painfully obvious to a child but not to a quackademic that pyramids on both sides of the Atlantic resemble each other way too closely to be randomly unrelated. Another little detail for your information: the Acambaro figurines depict apart from dinosaurs a lot of Egyptian looking simians. How do you explain all that inside of the framework of your paradigm, Coy Boy?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3997 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
Your evidence is yours and it is coloured with your prior assumptions and interpretations the cat may remain sceptical about. Mine is mine, Coy Boy. From the evidence I gathered it rather follows that you lot got very little clue on anything, dinosaurs and dragons might well be the same phenomenon, the simians might well be much older than you assume with a totally different history than you presume in your baboonish arrogance while some dinosaurs likely to have been around not so long ago.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024