Oni writes:
C'mon, we've been over this Straggler. The media is bias to it's interests. That's not conspiratorial, is it? I thought that was common knowledge.
The media has bias to it's interests? Of course. But how many people are there with significantly different interests in the media? If your answer is "not enough" then I can only but agree. The interests
are too narrow. Too few people
do have far too much influence.
But I still think that the idea that "the media" has this one, or at most two, sets of long term interests that you seem to imply requires more organisation, co-operation and planning than I think is realistic. It is this I find more conspiratorial than I can sign up to.
Essentially we have my "competing dispirate interests" argument resurfacing again I suppose.