Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Who Made God?
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8513
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 16 of 868 (688089)
01-19-2013 12:02 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by GDR
01-18-2013 11:37 PM


Re: The question of eternal existence.
Beyond faith the question of who created the creator is essentially a question that can best be addressed by science.
If your best science cannot address the very existence of such a thing then how can any science address any of its attributes?
But, I see my error. If the opening axiom is "it exists" then I'm in the wrong thread and will try to gracefully bow out without further stepping on my dick.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by GDR, posted 01-18-2013 11:37 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Phat, posted 01-19-2013 12:26 AM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied
 Message 18 by GDR, posted 01-19-2013 1:53 AM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18262
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


(1)
Message 17 of 868 (688091)
01-19-2013 12:26 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by AZPaul3
01-19-2013 12:02 AM


The crux: Logic and Evidence versus Faith and Desire
AZPaul3 writes:
If the opening axiom is "it exists" then I'm in the wrong thread and will try to gracefully bow out without further stepping on my dick.
It all has to do with a deception.
NIV writes:
2 Thess 2:10-12
They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. 11 For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie 12 and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness.
Now, I don't mean to suggest that everyone is willingly and knowingly wicked. What I do mean to suggest is that a relationship with Jesus Christ...now possible through the Spirit of God..is something that people become drawn to and love. Without loving this truth, people merely become in love with human intellectualism and demand signs and proof. This passage suggests that God Himself will thus send a delusion and people will believe the lie. The question is what this lie is?
Personally, I think that when people prefer that Jesus not exist in essence believe the lie that humanity on a dust speck will figure out the mystery of the universe and of meaning in life without wanting any need of relationship with God...made possible through His Son.
Quite honestly, I think that humans were meant to have communion with God through the Holy Spirit and awareness of Jesus Christ...messenger to humanity.
Granted I'm not being scientifically logical, but my premise is that this relationship is indeed a mystery and yet is real.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by AZPaul3, posted 01-19-2013 12:02 AM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 18 of 868 (688102)
01-19-2013 1:53 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by AZPaul3
01-19-2013 12:02 AM


Re: The question of eternal existence.
AZPaul3 writes:
If your best science cannot address the very existence of such a thing then how can any science address any of its attributes?
I agree that science is not the place to look for the attributes of any intelligent first cause, but the point I was trying to make is not about any attributes of that intelligence. It is simply that the idea of an eternal existence can be explained using what is currently theoretical science. It is just one possible explanation as to the answer of "Who Made God". The answer if this speculation is correct is that God, (or any other intelligent first cause) did not require a creator because he/she/it just always was and always will be.
AZPaul3 writes:
But, I see my error. If the opening axiom is "it exists" then I'm in the wrong thread and will try to gracefully bow out
I think it's just a case of that I probably didn't make my point clear enough. I wasn't arguing for the existence of God but only that if God exists that there is at least one plausible answer to the question asked in the title of the OP.
AZPaul3 writes:
without further stepping on my dick
Bragging again are we.....

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by AZPaul3, posted 01-19-2013 12:02 AM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 411 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 19 of 868 (688135)
01-19-2013 12:11 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Phat
01-18-2013 3:52 PM


Re: In the beginning car said let there be light and matter and time and space.
Phat writes:
Is it illogical to accept the belief that God existed before we did and that He has a definite character that we didn't ascribe to Him?
Any belief can have its own internally consistent logic. Logic in itself is not an indicator of reality.
The problem is that there are so many logically consistent gods, each with his own definite character. You seem to concede that some of them are made up. I'm just wondering why you think one is different.
Sure, there could be one real god and a whole passle of made-up ones - but how do you know yours is the real one?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Phat, posted 01-18-2013 3:52 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Phat, posted 01-19-2013 4:05 PM ringo has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18262
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 20 of 868 (688147)
01-19-2013 4:05 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by ringo
01-19-2013 12:11 PM


Should God be slanged or kept to oneself?
Ringo writes:
Sure, there could be one real god and a whole passle of made-up ones - but how do you know yours is the real one?
All that I can claim is that He is the real One in my belief. I could tell you with confidence that He also desires to love and commune with you and has the power to give you eternal life. Would it do any good, knowing your beliefs and family history as I do? Would it be necessary and expected for me to push my belief?
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by ringo, posted 01-19-2013 12:11 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Tangle, posted 01-20-2013 4:18 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied
 Message 22 by ramoss, posted 01-20-2013 12:05 PM Phat has replied
 Message 23 by ringo, posted 01-21-2013 12:00 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9489
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.9


(3)
Message 21 of 868 (688170)
01-20-2013 4:18 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by Phat
01-19-2013 4:05 PM


Re: Should God be slanged or kept to oneself?
Phat writes:
I could tell you with confidence that He also desires to love and commune with you and has the power to give you eternal life.
This has always been a puzzle to me. Believers always say this, but it's plainly false, if He wanted to talk to me He can, I'm here and happy to listen. Never has. Odd that.

Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Phat, posted 01-19-2013 4:05 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by GDR, posted 01-26-2013 12:46 PM Tangle has replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 612 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


(1)
Message 22 of 868 (688182)
01-20-2013 12:05 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Phat
01-19-2013 4:05 PM


Re: Should God be slanged or kept to oneself?
Now. you can have what ever belief you want. When it comes to others, it is 'can you show that your belief is true' is the question. What can you show me ??? How can you provide what you believe to be true without what is known as 'confirmation bias'? Can you find a way to take testimony of people away, and show that your belief is more than "warm fuzzy feelings"/

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Phat, posted 01-19-2013 4:05 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 714 by Phat, posted 08-02-2019 3:29 AM ramoss has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 411 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


(1)
Message 23 of 868 (688262)
01-21-2013 12:00 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Phat
01-19-2013 4:05 PM


Re: Should God be slanged or kept to oneself?
Phat writes:
All that I can claim is that He is the real One in my belief.
That sounds a bit like somebody saying his wife/girlfriend is the "only one" for him. How do you distinguish between "the best of many" (which only includes the ones you've met) and "only one exists"?
Phat writes:
Would it be necessary and expected for me to push my belief?
Is it "nesessary and espected" for me to push my belief that Coca-Cola is the only "real" soft drink?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Phat, posted 01-19-2013 4:05 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


(1)
Message 24 of 868 (688545)
01-23-2013 1:44 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Phat
01-18-2013 3:46 PM


Re: Might need to clarify...
Phat writes:
The light shines in the darkness but the darkness has not understood it.
I suppose its human nature to reject something that we cannot explain. Some critics say that we reject anything that challenges our own reasoning and that deep down its in our nature to reject an authority higher than our own human wisdom.
Sounds like something that could be said of anyone, about pretty much anything.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Phat, posted 01-18-2013 3:46 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 1.9


(2)
Message 25 of 868 (688909)
01-26-2013 12:46 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Tangle
01-20-2013 4:18 AM


Re: Should God be slanged or kept to oneself?
Tangle writes:
This has always been a puzzle to me. Believers always say this, but it's plainly false, if He wanted to talk to me He can, I'm here and happy to listen. Never has. Odd that.
Hi Tangle
You're walking down the street and there is a blind street person who is asking for a few coins. You feel the need to help this person and so you take him with you to the deli and buy him a meal.
I'm a Christian, and as such, I would suggest that was God speaking to you and you did indeed listen. An atheist would say that this feeling and action is just something that has culturally and socially evolved over thousands of years from a completely natural, non-moral and non-intelligent beginning.
We have no way of proving which is correct. We all have our own specific beliefs but hopefully that gives you an idea of what Phat is talking about.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Tangle, posted 01-20-2013 4:18 AM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Tangle, posted 01-26-2013 2:53 PM GDR has replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9489
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.9


(1)
Message 26 of 868 (688915)
01-26-2013 2:53 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by GDR
01-26-2013 12:46 PM


Re: Should God be slanged or kept to oneself?
GDR writes:
I'm a Christian, and as such, I would suggest that was God speaking to you and you did indeed listen.
But it wasn't God speaking at all was it? There were no words or any indication at all that the motivation came from outside the individual. Nothing.
The instinct is also there in Muslims and atheists so, obviously, it can't have anything to do with being a Christian.
An atheist would say that this feeling and action is just something that has culturally and socially evolved over thousands of years from a completely natural, non-moral and non-intelligent beginning.
That's correct - and unlike the God thing, we have evidence for it and can see it happening in the brain using fMRI scans.
We have no way of proving which is correct. We all have our own specific beliefs but hopefully that gives you an idea of what Phat is talking about.
The thing is, if you think that your God is interfering with your emotions in a direct and physical way such that we can actually see parts of the brain being stimulated by moral emotions then there's no such thing as free will.
But all this aside, when a believer says that God speaks to him, they give the the impression that this is a personal and direct experience, but when quizzed, it turns out to be a very, very indirect affair.
To admit that they actually converse with god is an admission of mental derangement because we all know that it doesn't actually happen that way - it's a one way process that results in a requirement to attribute a reply through indirect means, which to everybody else are simply everyday, common phenomenon.

Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by GDR, posted 01-26-2013 12:46 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by GDR, posted 01-26-2013 5:56 PM Tangle has replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 27 of 868 (688923)
01-26-2013 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Tangle
01-26-2013 2:53 PM


Re: Should God be slanged or kept to oneself?
Tangle writes:
But it wasn't God speaking at all was it? There were no words or any indication at all that the motivation came from outside the individual. Nothing.
Absolutely. That was the point. It is my belief as a Christian that God speaks through our hearts, minds and imaginations. I wasn’t suggesting that it was an audible voice, and as I said there is no way to prove that it is anything external to the individual.
Tangle writes:
The instinct is also there in Muslims and atheists so, obviously, it can't have anything to do with being a Christian.
I agree that God speaks to the hearts, minds and imaginations of all mankind and not just Christians.
GDR writes:
An atheist would say that this feeling and action is just something that has culturally and socially evolved over thousands of years from a completely natural, non-moral and non-intelligent beginning.
Tangle writes:
That's correct - and unlike the God thing, we have evidence for it an d can see it happening in the brain using fMRI scans.
You can’t see a thought with a brain scan. An idea is non-physical. You can see the impact that an idea has on the brain but that tells us nothing about the impetus for the thought itself.
Tangle writes:
The thing is, if you think that your God is interfering with your emotions in a direct and physical way such that we can actually see parts of the brain being stimulated by moral emotions then there's no such thing as free will.
I don’t see it as God interfering. I believe that God in general implants in our minds a concept of doing the loving thing and we have the free will to accept or reject the unselfish loving thought or action.
Tangle writes:
But all this aside, when a believer says that God speaks to him, they give the the impression that this is a personal and direct experience, but when quizzed, it turns out to be a very, very indirect affair.
I think that it sometimes is a direct experience. A number of years ago out of nowhere I felt that I should go and become a lay-reader in our church. I hadn't considered it previously but I felt this urge that that was what I should do. One of the things that the lay-readers did in that church, was to go into a Montreal senior’s residence and lead a Sunday worship service. This in turn led to a ministry, (over 30 years so far), with seniors leading sing-a-longs. I choose to believe that it was God that put that idea into my head but I obviously have no conclusive proof of that.
However, I think that is more the exception than the rule. I think God is that still small voice or conscience that nudges us towards having loving unselfish hearts.
Tangle writes:
To admit that they actually converse with god is an admission of mental derangement because we all know that it doesn't actually happen that way
That is true of my experience but I can’t speak for anyone else.
Tangle writes:
it's a one way process that results in a requirement to attribute a reply through indirect means, which to everybody else are simply everyday, common phenomenon.
That is how it appears but there is a great many things about our existence that aren't what they appear.
BTW. I think we may be a tad off topic.

He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Tangle, posted 01-26-2013 2:53 PM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Tangle, posted 01-27-2013 3:16 AM GDR has replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9489
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.9


(1)
Message 28 of 868 (688989)
01-27-2013 3:16 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by GDR
01-26-2013 5:56 PM


Re: Should God be slanged or kept to oneself?
GDR writes:
BTW. I think we may be a tad off topic.
It looks like we're done - you simply believe something for which there isn't a scrap of evidence yet there's an everyday explanation and I find that totally preposterous, but that's hardly new here

Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by GDR, posted 01-26-2013 5:56 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by GDR, posted 01-27-2013 3:20 PM Tangle has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


(1)
Message 29 of 868 (688991)
01-27-2013 3:59 AM


A Sketch of the Biblical View of God and gods
After a skip and hop through this thread I have a few thoughts on the various subjects.
Phat's inspiration for the thread was a book by Ravi Zacharias and Norman Geisler, both well respected Christian teachers, but I don't see where any of it was spelled out so all I can say is I'm sure it's a good solid Christian presentation.
Somebody brought up all the various gods, Zeus, Thor, etc., might as well add Horus, Isis, Molech, Tammuz, Krishna and all the hundreds of Hindu deities and all the rest from all the nations. According to the people who worship them, these are not human inventions, they are real living entities. According to the Bible they are demons, fallen angels who followed Satan when he fell from grace. Because of the Fall Satan became "the prince of this world" and his demonic hordes became the "gods" that have seduced human beings ever since. The various witch doctors or shamans of the varous religions acquire "supernatural" powers by getting themselves possessed by these entities. It's all because Adam and Eve disobeyed the true God and became captive to the evil powers.
God however did promise to save Adam and His posterity and gave that promise all the way back in Eden, to send the Messiah, the Seed of the Woman that would crush the head of Satan, and He repeated this promise to His various prophets thereafter. The original Patriarchs from Seth to Noah all believed in the promised Messiah. So did Job who spoke of expecting some day to see his Redeemer in the flesh, so did Abraham, Moses and all the judges and prophets of Israel and some of the kings expect Him etc. etc. etc. The OT is full of the promises of God to send His Messiah to save His people from their sins.
None of this is made up, it's all real.
GDR seems to think that all human beings hear from God and he gave the illustration of being moved to help a homeless person. From the point of view of Biblical theology that is wrong. That's just conscience, which all human beings have to one extent or another, a remnant of our having been created in the image of God, but not a direct hearing from God.
The human spirit that was in intimate contact with God before the Fall in Eden was lost, that was the main consequence of the Fall, so fallen humanity is no longer are able to communicate with God through our spirit. For that to be possible we must be born again as Jesus put it, and that comes through believing who Jesus is as the Bible presents Him and recognizing that He is the Messiah who died to pay for our sins so that our spirit and our communication with God COULD be restored that was lost through original sin in Eden. Those who repent and believe and are born again DO hear from God -- in many ways, not audibly however -- audible voices are from demons as are many other "supernatural" phenomena.
People have always had experiences of the "gods" and know by experience that they are real. But the way Christians who believe in the Bible know the reality of God is by believing what the Bible says, believing the witnesses who testify to their experiences of the work of the true God in this world. It's not a blind faith, and it's not an experience, you are believing in testimony. And most Christians will tell you that once they truly believe then they also do experience God in various ways, speaking in a personal way through His word being the most common I suppose.

He who surrenders the first page of his Bible surrenders all. --John William Burgon, Inspiration and Interpretation, Sermon II.

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Tangle, posted 01-27-2013 5:22 AM Faith has replied
 Message 38 by ramoss, posted 01-28-2013 9:56 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 40 by xongsmith, posted 01-29-2013 1:11 AM Faith has not replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9489
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 30 of 868 (688994)
01-27-2013 5:22 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by Faith
01-27-2013 3:59 AM


Re: A Sketch of the Biblical View of God and gods
Faith writes:
None of this is made up, it's all real
Alternatively, it's all made up and none of it's real.
If you want to make any further progress after asserting something to be real, you need to demonstrate that it is real. No-one in a few thousand years of trying has ever done so. I really doubt that you're any different.

Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Faith, posted 01-27-2013 3:59 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Faith, posted 01-27-2013 3:04 PM Tangle has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024