Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Proof Synthesis
Russell E. Rierson
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 6 (68699)
11-22-2003 11:14 PM


This is an interpretation of Anslem, Langan, Leibniz, Goedel, and Hartshorne.
1. Matter is a form of energy; energy is primary to matter.
2. Energy is defined[ in physics] as the ability to do work.
3. Work is defined as [Force*Distance].
4. Force is an aspect of a distributed field; fields are primary to energy.
5. Physical laws determine the dynamics of quantum fields; physical law is primary to fields.
6. Physical laws must have a principle of organization.
7. Either physical laws result from a unifying principle of organization, or, physical laws result from an infinite regress.
8. Infinite regress is an absurdity, therefore, physical laws are the result of an organizing principle.
9. "Organizing principle" implies purpose, purpose implies mind.
10. If the "organizing principle" is derivative of mind, then mind is primary to physical law.
11.The mind that is primary to physical law is called "God"
Definition:
G = God = creator
C = creation = that wich is created
C is dependent on G.
Without G, C would not exist.
P--->Q
means "if P then Q" ,
P
therefore Q
[1.] G is necessary or G is impossible, G or not-G
[2..] If G exists, G's existence is necessary, "N" , G--->N[G]
[3.] The existence of G is not a contradiction
[4.] Therefore G is not impossible
[5.] N[G] or not-N[G]
[6.] not-N[G]--->N{not-N[G]}
[7.] N[G] or N{not-N[G]}
[8.] N{not-N[G]}--->N[not-G]
[9.] N[G] or N[not-G]
[10.] not-N[not-G]
[11.] N[G]
[12.] G
`
[This message has been edited by Russell E. Rierson, 11-22-2003]

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by sidelined, posted 11-22-2003 11:46 PM Russell E. Rierson has not replied
 Message 3 by :æ:, posted 11-23-2003 12:38 PM Russell E. Rierson has not replied
 Message 4 by Mike Holland, posted 11-23-2003 6:31 PM Russell E. Rierson has not replied
 Message 5 by world, posted 12-05-2003 11:45 PM Russell E. Rierson has not replied
 Message 6 by Silent H, posted 12-07-2003 1:01 PM Russell E. Rierson has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024