What is missing from the theory of evolution

The defies most definitions of what instincts are. Many inherited instincts are observed and pretty constant from culture. It's more likely that in the pre-modern world people without such instincts died. For instance there are a number of social instincts and reactions that have proven beneficial for a complex social species, people without such traits may become outcasts or less liked within the population meaning they were less likely to reproduce. These social instincts are such a part of human behavior that we say that people without them have a disability. One example I believe is Asperger's syndrome and varying forms of it. They are not. The decision comes from breaking the "normal" behavior. We are directed yes.... but by behaviors often needed to be part of a population. Those that didn't have them in the past died or were less likely to reproduce.

Is it common for you to take a single section of a post and ignore the rest? I will cease talking with you if you do this again, please don't assume you "won" if I do this.I explained were such ingrained traits come from and I did not include" intelligent programming"(which seems to be what you're saying) at all.I said the following

quote:

---

DC85 said:
It's more likely that in the pre-modern world people without such instincts died. For instance there are a number of social instincts and reactions that have proven beneficial for a complex social species, people without such traits may become outcasts or less liked within the population meaning they were less likely to reproduce. These social instincts are such a part of human behavior that we say that people without them have a disability. One example I believe is Asperger's syndrome and varying forms of it.

---

Edited by DC85, : spelling

You are FALSELY claiming that I said the humans have always had these traits when I am actually saying that they evolved through the course of human evolution because the more "social butterfly" you are the better your chance of survival.You appear to be taking me out of context.Edited by DC85, : No reason given.

There is no evidence of these being learned behaviors in fact the opposite is true. We observe chemical reactions involved that can even be modified by medication.Learned behaviors or "Habits" tend to create new pathways in the brain. Very very different things.

Indeed, and large portions of how humans do around other humans are subconscious or seem to be to many studies. Of course it isn't, I however used it as an quick example and I believe the most well known and studied.

Except for the fact it's far more complex then conscious and unconscious. We have behaviors that are normal and observed throughout the majority of people that can be shown to be the result of reactions in the brain. None of them are "Hidden from us."Then we have unconscious behaviors that started as conscious behavior that through the course of our minds "reward system" become "habits" these literally carve out new pathways in the brain. We do not observe this same pathway reaction with instinct behavior meaning learned behavior cannot be inherited.I also would like to recommend a book called "The Power of Habit" by Charles Duhigg. It likely the easiest way I've seen it explainedEdited by DC85, : No reason given.