Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,787 Year: 4,044/9,624 Month: 915/974 Week: 242/286 Day: 3/46 Hour: 1/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Dates and Dating ⇒ The SEVEN "DAYS" WERE GEOLOGICAL ERAS ⇒

Summations Only

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev12
Author Topic:   The SEVEN "DAYS" WERE GEOLOGICAL ERAS
Panda
Member (Idle past 3739 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 145 of 310 (682739)
12-05-2012 5:41 AM 		Reply to: Message 140 by kofh2u
12-04-2012 9:36 PM

Re: REFERENCED ASSERTIONS BY KOFH2U
kofh2u writes:
​
Let's review my references for stating in Gen 1:1 that seven stages generally describe what happened "In the beginning:"
Why should we review it?
It has already been shown that there are more than 7 cosmological eras.
Your list is incomplete - you admitted that.
Your claims are wrong.
​
There is no connection between the number of cosmological eras and the number 7 nor the 7 days in the Genesis story.
Do you agree or not?
​
There is no connection between the BBT and geological eras.
Do you agree or not?
"There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by kofh2u, posted 12-04-2012 9:36 PM kofh2u has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by kofh2u, posted 12-05-2012 8:29 AM Panda has replied
  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3739 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 146 of 310 (682740)
12-05-2012 5:48 AM 		Reply to: Message 144 by kofh2u
12-05-2012 1:48 AM

Re: Selective learning
kofh2u writes:
​
Above, I referenced six different Science sources that sum up the Big Bang pretty much in the seven steps which I did.
No, you didn't.
With the exception of one link that undermined your claims, all your other images are from your own web-page (even though it is clear you have stolen them from elsewhere).
You clearly have trouble finding any support for your claims, even from the trillion web-pages that currently exist.
​
kofh2u writes:
​
And, below here, I am listing the seven "days" of Genesis compared to the seven references of Science in regard to the History of the Earth:
I will get back to your cherry picking of geological eras after I have finished with your cherry picking of cosmological eras.
​
You do know that cherry-picking is fallacious and dishonest and undermines any claims you make, yes?
Did you read the link I provided to confirmation bias and cherry-picking?
Do you realise that you are cherry-picking your data to support your claims?
​
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
"There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by kofh2u, posted 12-05-2012 1:48 AM kofh2u has not replied
  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3739 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 152 of 310 (682758)
12-05-2012 10:20 AM 		Reply to: Message 147 by kofh2u
12-05-2012 8:29 AM

Re: REFERENCED ASSERTIONS BY KOFH2U
The 7 days of Genesis covers both cosmological AND geological eras.
But you have linked 7 cosmological eras AND 7 geological eras.
This would require 14 biblical days.
​
But that is ok - because you will simply ignore 7 of the eras so that you can continue to claim a correlation between science and the bible.
​
You do know that cherry-picking is fallacious and dishonest and undermines any claims you make, yes?
Did you read the link I provided to confirmation bias and cherry-picking?
Do you realise that you are cherry-picking your data to support your claims?
​
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
"There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by kofh2u, posted 12-05-2012 8:29 AM kofh2u has not replied
  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3739 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 163 of 310 (682795)
12-05-2012 12:45 PM 		Reply to: Message 162 by New Cat's Eye
12-05-2012 12:24 PM

Re: Nonsense
At what point can we be confident that kofh is mentally unbalanced?
How far passed that point are we?
"There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
This message is a reply to:
 Message 162 by New Cat's Eye, posted 12-05-2012 12:24 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 164 by Eli, posted 12-05-2012 12:48 PM Panda has not replied
 Message 165 by New Cat's Eye, posted 12-05-2012 2:30 PM Panda has not replied
  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3739 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 219 of 310 (683139)
12-07-2012 9:25 PM 		Reply to: Message 218 by Eli
12-07-2012 8:45 PM

Re: My Thread on the Science of Genesis
Eli writes:
​
I really hope you don't actually believe that the human anatomy falls in those dimensions.
​
That's one tiny head.
Kofh2u has already been told that the proportions are completely wrong.
​
But, as usual, he chose to ignore that information and instead re-posted the same stupid diagram.
​
It can be checked on any biology website, or just type 'spine' into google image search:
​
He appears immune to both learning and reality.
"There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
This message is a reply to:
 Message 218 by Eli, posted 12-07-2012 8:45 PM Eli has seen this message but not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 220 by jar, posted 12-07-2012 9:33 PM Panda has seen this message but not replied
  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3739 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 269 of 310 (683284)
12-09-2012 12:07 PM 		Reply to: Message 261 by kofh2u
12-09-2012 10:08 AM

Re: There is no science in Genesis.
kofh2u writes:
​
Gen. 1:1 In the beginning, (the Formative/Cosmology Era), God, (the Uncaused First Cause, or the Dark Energy which pre-existed the material Universe, perhaps), created... (all that which has followed the Big Bang from the singularity of Planck Time which consisted of
​
Seven Stages:
1) The Inflation Era
2) The Quark Era
3) Hadron Era
4) Lepton Era
5) Nucleosynthesis Era
6) Opaque Era
7) Matter Era,...
And as you agreed:
kofh2u writes:
​
"There is no connection between the number of cosmological eras and the number 7 nor the 7 days in the Genesis story," nor was any INTENTIONALLY implied.
​
So - your own claim is denied by you.
​
It seems that everyone - including you - agrees that there is no connection between the Big Bang eras and the Genesis 7 days....except you.
"There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
This message is a reply to:
 Message 261 by kofh2u, posted 12-09-2012 10:08 AM kofh2u has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 272 by kofh2u, posted 12-09-2012 12:45 PM Panda has not replied
  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3739 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010

Normal Thread Display

(1)
Message 307 of 310 (683450)
12-10-2012 4:57 PM

kofh2u writes:
​
a personal preference for some nonsense, metaphysical, ancient medieval rooted teachings
kofh2u writes:
​
"There is no connection between the number of cosmological eras and the number 7 nor the 7 days in the Genesis story," nor was any INTENTIONALLY implied.
2 pertinent quotes from kofh2u himself.
​
Nuff said.
"There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Prev12
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024