Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,905 Year: 4,162/9,624 Month: 1,033/974 Week: 360/286 Day: 3/13 Hour: 1/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Geology and the Great Flood ⇒

Slightly different evidence for an old Earth

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Slightly different evidence for an old Earth
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 16 of 21 (67980)
11-20-2003 12:17 PM 		Reply to: Message 15 by mike the wiz
11-20-2003 12:12 PM

quote:
Again,I'm not being biased but, from ny perspective why couldn't the flood explain the fluctuations if there wasn't that many colours of change. Surely the flood would have made fluctuations possible if we are talking about sea levels?
​
I'm no more a geologist than you are Mike, but this might be a rough road to go down. You seem to be narrowing the possible time from 6,000 years to 40 days. From where I'm standing, that would weigh further against creation.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by mike the wiz, posted 11-20-2003 12:12 PM mike the wiz has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by mike the wiz, posted 11-20-2003 12:19 PM Dan Carroll has replied
  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 18 of 21 (67983)
11-20-2003 12:22 PM 		Reply to: Message 17 by mike the wiz
11-20-2003 12:19 PM

I know. I'm just tossing out a layman's opinion... if his main argument is that 6,000 years isn't possible, then 40 days, no matter the sea upheavals going on in those days, seems even less likely.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by mike the wiz, posted 11-20-2003 12:19 PM mike the wiz has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024