You, sir, are no Wegener or Galileo.
They could actually evidence what they were claiming. It isn't a preconcieved notion that makes EVERYONE in the forum reject you. It is that you have no substance.
I change my mind all the time, depending on what the evidence tells me. Yesterday I did a complete 180 on my view of payday loans because of a factor that I had not considered previously.
The fact remains that you simply do not know what you are talking about. Different points of view are not equal and not all should be entertained, especially the conclusions drawn based on non-truths... you know, the stuff you keep presenting as evidence which turns out to be absolute horse-shit.
You have nothing to offer because you don't deal in facts. It isn't that I don't have an open mind. It's that I happen to know these subjects, so I can spot an idea that has no merit.
As long as you keep presenting things you made up and lie about what the science is, you will never ever have anything to offer. That's on you, not the reader.