|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Summations Only | Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The one and only non-creationist in this forum. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
subbie Member (Idle past 1282 days) Posts: 3509 Joined: |
That explains what you are doing, not why.
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate Howling about evidence is a conversation stopper, and it never stops to think if the claim could possibly be true -- foreveryoung
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3741 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Panda writes:
Why would we want to discuss anything with [Mad], when [Mad] have clearly left reality behind.subbie writes:
I was wondering the same thing, which makes your 9 posts in this thread rather curious.Panda writes:
We are simply here responding to [Mad's] trolling in whatever way we feel like.subbie writes:
You asked why I was having a discussion with Mad. That explains what you are doing, not why.My reply was that I am not having a discussion with Mad (because he is a troll). Are you now asking 'why' I am not having a discussion with Mad?I think I answered that in my first sentence. "There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreveryoung Member (Idle past 610 days) Posts: 921 Joined:
|
nonukes writes: well if that's what Alfred wants, that's the way it is. That sounds similar to this:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aware Wolf Member (Idle past 1448 days) Posts: 156 From: New Hampshire, USA Joined:
|
Man, I have no idea what you are talking about most of the time, but I love reading your posts. They've got a kind of sing-songie flow to them. They remind me of many rock or pop songs who's lyrics come way close to making sense but don't actually, like by the bands Yes or Coldplay.
Edited by Aware Wolf, : grammar
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Alfred Maddenstein writes:
I haven't said that I even have a conception of "how" an atom can be created from nothing. I'm saying that that conception is no more dfficult than the alternative - and the difficulty of conceiving something has no bearing on the reality of that something anyway. You evade fleshing out you conception of creation of a single atom from pure nothing, Macca. Tell the audience how it's done. What is the physical mechanism apart from your second-hand crypto-creo faith? Edited by ringo, : Aded missing word "created".
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10084 Joined: Member Rating: 5.1
|
You've got a grave problem with definitions.
Wow, a website dedicated to semantic fallacies.
Otherwise what is exactly the contribution of bigbangism to progress and science that you are hinting at? The BB explains galactic redshift, the CMB, time dilation in distant type Ia supernovae, and a whole host of other observations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3995 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
What is so difficult about the alternative, Macca? Do you have trouble conceiving the atoms to exists? All exist, no matter how many, all interconnected and separated proportionately by varying distances you have the choice of calling either space or time. Simple to conceive. You don't have to strain yourself and ape authority like in the case of imagining nothing, singularities, big holes and expanding black bunks, curved vacuums and suchlike nonsense. It's all around you. It's present, dude.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3995 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
You mean offers no plausible explanation to those observations. Redshift of the signal explained with stretching intergalactic distances is strictly for birds. Space, time and light speed signal are three sides of a triangle. It's Maxwell's wavelength times frequency. Adding the stretched wavelength to the distance the signal travels is a howler. It's sneaking a fourth side to the triangle. Impossible violation of the formula. No wonder they've got the cosmos measurements all screwed up and have to cook the data to fit the curves. It's all mediaeval and Ptolemaic.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10084 Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
Redshift of the signal explained with stretching intergalactic distances is strictly for birds. I guess I don't understand what you are getting at here. Are you saying that expansion would not produce redshifts?
Space, time and light speed signal are three sides of a triangle. Since when? You seem to be making stuff up.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Alfred Maddenstein writes:
But reality is seldom simple. Easy answers are seldom satisfying.
Simple to conceive.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vimesey Member (Idle past 101 days) Posts: 1398 From: Birmingham, England Joined: |
Easy answers are seldom satisfying. Well, they can be - but only to the simple minded Could there be any greater conceit, than for someone to believe that the universe has to be simple enough for them to be able to understand it ?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3995 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
You got it, Macca. Complexity is conserved. Reality is always complex enough anywhere so it is not to be resolved to a primitive singularity. Neither can it go to the other extreme and prove to be as convoluted as the imagination of a human monkey.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3995 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
Exactly, Whimsy. Only simple-minded crypto-creos are satisfied with primitive solutions like that of all things starting at once in the same place offered by big-bangism.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred Maddenstein Member (Idle past 3995 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
No, what I am saying is that expansion of space is a ludicrous concept not explaining in any way the observation of the redshift of the signal. Space is an abstraction and not an expandable fabric while the Universe is anywhere already so could not possibly expand. Therefore the explanation of the shift to the red end of the spectrum of the distant radiation signal offered by the quacks is strictly for birds. Apart from making a mockery of the original Maxwell formula.
Of course, mathematically the relation could be easily reduced to the relation of sides in a triangle. Speed of light is just a conversion factor between space and time measurements. The cat is not making anything up.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 312 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
But what should we say to Maddenstein except: "You are a fucking halfwit"?
If the moderators would like to make a suggestion, I'm all ears. But what should we say, what can we say, except that he is mentally handicapped and we cannot cure him?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024