Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ice Age is a Product of the Flood (Peeta Mellark and Coyote only)
Peeta Mellark
Junior Member (Idle past 4221 days)
Posts: 16
Joined: 08-29-2012


Message 1 of 23 (671739)
08-29-2012 11:14 PM


Are there any evolutionists out there who have the balls to get in a one on one debate about how people got to North America???
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Topic title changed from "How did people get to North America?" to "Ice Age is a Product of the Flood" (Peeta Mellark and Coyote only)".
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Remove superfluous " from topic title.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-29-2012 11:28 PM Peeta Mellark has replied

  
Peeta Mellark
Junior Member (Idle past 4221 days)
Posts: 16
Joined: 08-29-2012


Message 3 of 23 (671741)
08-29-2012 11:38 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Adminnemooseus
08-29-2012 11:28 PM


Re: How about a short version of your perspective?
Well I'm gonna have to go with the Flood. Because during the Flood, the earths temperature would have been greatly reduced due to the fact that we would have had 100% cloud cover and in some spots there wouldn't be rain, but snow. Therefore the flood would have resulted in the Ice Age which would have made ice bridges connecting the continents.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-29-2012 11:28 PM Adminnemooseus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-29-2012 11:56 PM Peeta Mellark has replied

  
Peeta Mellark
Junior Member (Idle past 4221 days)
Posts: 16
Joined: 08-29-2012


Message 5 of 23 (671743)
08-30-2012 12:14 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Adminnemooseus
08-29-2012 11:56 PM


Re: A "The flood caused the ice age" topic?
Alright, I'm fine with that. But I don't think this would be after the flood, I'm trying to say that the ice would have been formed during the flood, and right now we can still see some of the ice from the flood on Antarctica and in the Arctic. This would also mean that the ice that remains on the earth is not really melting to much (due to Global Warming), but instead it is just returning to the way it was before the flood occurred.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-29-2012 11:56 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Peeta Mellark
Junior Member (Idle past 4221 days)
Posts: 16
Joined: 08-29-2012


Message 9 of 23 (671863)
08-30-2012 11:46 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Coyote
08-30-2012 9:53 AM


Alright but first I just wanna be clear about something. How many years is the YEC supposed to compose of? I've heard 4000yrs, 5800yrs, and 6000yrs (6000 is the one that I prefer to use but it's up to you).
Edited by Peeta Mellark, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Coyote, posted 08-30-2012 9:53 AM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-31-2012 12:13 AM Peeta Mellark has replied
 Message 13 by Coyote, posted 08-31-2012 1:47 AM Peeta Mellark has not replied

  
Peeta Mellark
Junior Member (Idle past 4221 days)
Posts: 16
Joined: 08-29-2012


Message 11 of 23 (671869)
08-31-2012 12:49 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Adminnemooseus
08-31-2012 12:13 AM


Re: The YEC time-frame
Alright, then I'm gonna begin with early Genesis where God created Adam and Eve. The original plan God had for them was a sinless, eternal life on earth. This type of life style was carried out until the Devil convinced them to sin. This first sin was what brought shame into the world and caused Adam and Eve to make clothes.
If people never died (and were void of sin/shame) then we wouldn't have to worry about freezing to death, and therefore would have no real reason to where clothes.
Do you have any ideas why we could go anywhere on earth without freezing to death?
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-31-2012 12:13 AM Adminnemooseus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-31-2012 1:05 AM Peeta Mellark has replied

  
Peeta Mellark
Junior Member (Idle past 4221 days)
Posts: 16
Joined: 08-29-2012


(1)
Message 14 of 23 (671947)
08-31-2012 10:29 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Adminnemooseus
08-31-2012 1:05 AM


Re: Not anywhere near on-topic
In order to prove that there was an ice age intertwined with the flood, you must first prove (or give a reason) that the flood could have happened.
The whole point of my asking for a one-on-one debate was to keep other people from intervening, and as the one who set the tone for this debate I reserve the right to ask any question that I believe will help me to better understand my adversary.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-31-2012 1:05 AM Adminnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Coyote, posted 08-31-2012 10:31 PM Peeta Mellark has replied

  
Peeta Mellark
Junior Member (Idle past 4221 days)
Posts: 16
Joined: 08-29-2012


Message 16 of 23 (671951)
08-31-2012 10:47 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Coyote
08-31-2012 10:31 PM


Re: Not anywhere near on-topic
I did ask, but the Admin. blocked it. So unless it is unblocked I am gonna have to come up with a new opening statement. If you want to start with your own opening statement/question then feel free to do so because this might take me an hour or so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Coyote, posted 08-31-2012 10:31 PM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Coyote, posted 08-31-2012 11:12 PM Peeta Mellark has replied

  
Peeta Mellark
Junior Member (Idle past 4221 days)
Posts: 16
Joined: 08-29-2012


Message 18 of 23 (671955)
08-31-2012 11:44 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Coyote
08-31-2012 11:12 PM


Re: Not anywhere near on-topic
Yeah, I heard that you are an archeologist. That's good because then you might be able to tell me why an Ice Age would be impossible when the earth is already covered in water (especially when you consider that a lot of the precipitation that would have fallen during the flood would have been snow due to the low temperatures caused by having 100% cloud cover)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Coyote, posted 08-31-2012 11:12 PM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Coyote, posted 08-31-2012 11:55 PM Peeta Mellark has replied

  
Peeta Mellark
Junior Member (Idle past 4221 days)
Posts: 16
Joined: 08-29-2012


Message 20 of 23 (671958)
09-01-2012 12:06 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Coyote
08-31-2012 11:55 PM


Re: Floods and glaciers
Alright now I've got a couple more questions: How do we know how many Ice Ages there were, and what tells us that there even were any? And (with the exception of carbon dating) how do we know how old the universe is?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Coyote, posted 08-31-2012 11:55 PM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Coyote, posted 09-01-2012 9:46 AM Peeta Mellark has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024