I have supplied you with two definitions for natural selection.
Neither of which is adequate, one being fundamentally erroneous.
An old darwinian definition "survival of the fittest"
But that isn't Darwinian by any means. Darwin only used that term in the 5th edition (of six) of "On The Origin Of Species," published some 9 years and 3 months after the original publication of the book (Nov. 1859 to Feb. 1869). Darwin never liked the term and
never used it without making a reference to his theory, natural selection. The phrase, "survival of the fittest," was coined by the socialist philosopher, Herbert Spencer, after he had read Darwin's book. Darwin finally used the phrase after it had become common as a reference to his theory. He only did so after convincing by T.H. Huxley.
So you are wrong. "Survival of the fittest" isn't an old Darwinian definition but an incorrect understanding of Darwin's theory that was forced on him by a social theorist whose idea was accepted by the populous.
and another which I have conjured up myself.
I have to wonder why you thought that was necessary. Why do you not think that the biological definition of natural selection, used by evolutionary biologists everywhere and the one that I learned more that 40 years ago is sufficient?
I am totally bemused as to how you have chosen to define natural selection, as "screening process" doesn't really tell me anything.
Nor does your definition tell anyone anything. Let's see. What did you say?
quote:
Natural selection, rather than being defined as "survival of the fittest" might be better viewed as "allele domination under significant environmental and sexual selection pressures".
Well, at least you seem to recognize that "survival of the fittest" is a totally erroneous definition of natural selection. However, your definition is unnecessary and extraneous. Why not go with the definition used by evolutionary biologists? Looking at natural selection as a screening process is a pretty good understanding of the concept.
Perhaps you would be kind enough to offer your own definition.
I would be happy to. This is the definition that I learned more than 40 years ago and that is still used by evolutionary biologists today.
Natural selection is the differential reproductive success of organisms that possess benificial genetic traits (that lend a reproductive advantage).
I added the parenthetical phrase in order to clarify for you. That parenthetical phrase is actually redundant.
And as for mutation, I didn't even mention mutation once in my post. Does mutation have anything to do with this topic?
As noted, mutation is one of the sources of genetic diversity upon which natural selection acts. Mutation and natural selection are but 2 of the 9 recognized mechanisms of evolution. Would you like to learn about them?