Doesn't the prevailing view imply that those things that are seriously damaging to the chance of reproduction will get filtered out?
If so, doesn't the prevailing view imply that random mutations that are NOT seriously damaging to the chance of reproduction get retained?
If that is true, then doesn't the prevailing view predict that random mutations that may be useful in the future but not useful at the moment also do not get filtered out?
In that case, how does the FL model differ? How can you determine is something was intentional or just dumb luck?
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!