It is really very simple.
You seem to think that something that "should be" really is. The very fact that the word "should" can be asserted proves that it does not exist.
Rights exist only when recognized by a State, culture or society. There is no such thing as a universal or inalienable right except within the consensus of that State, culture or society.
Rights are simply a construct of a given State, culture or society an even then are usually limited in context and extent, and are created through a consensus within that State, culture or society and have no existence outside that State, culture or society and are not even universal or inalienable within that State, culture or society.
It is only when that State, culture or society removes the term "should" and substitutes the term "is" through either building consensus or imposition by force, compulsion, intimidation or coercion that the rights have any existence.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!