According to the scientific method, absolute certainty cannot exist.
This appears to reduce to the statement:
"The only certainty, is uncertainty"
A type of circular reasoning? So the scientific method itself, employs a type of paradoxical and pejoratively circular logic? In fact, there seems to be no escaping certain types of circular logic. It is built into the very structure of our cognitive machinery. The ultimate limits of observation, i.e. the extremely small approaching zero and extremely large at the end of the universe, appear to be forever beyond our reach.
It can be acknowledged that quantum phase inhibitors exist in the neural underpinnings of certain sentient programs. A type of built in ego identity fail-safe that prevents total systemic collapse in the neural subroutines ensuring that redundancy is not compromised.
So we see that atheism-theism are two sides of the same coin? What is needed is true mathematical closure in the cognitive matrix of the ostensible TOE theorizer, not delusional, identity protective fail-safes. Therefore, belief systems must be analyzed from a higher level of abstraction, a deeper level of truth.
Does a first principle exist to remedy the dilemma of discovering the true approach to the ultimate truths? How can we be sure that logic is the most basic of basic starting points.
Conjecture:
[Mathematical Reality ] = [Physical Reality ]
For example:
Einstein:
R_uv - [1/2]g_uv R = 8pi G T_uv
is more correct than
Newton:
F = G m1 m2 /r^2
The Einstein field equations look very elegant and they contain much more information in their tensor formulations with regards to structure of spacetime and its relation to matter and energy, than does the Newtonian law of gravity. Tensors are a generalization of the "vector" concept. So, generalizations can be closer to isomorphism with reality than the more primitive abstract constructs.
So the exact correspondence, i.e. "one to one and onto", becomes a type of "limit", in the compression of information via powerful generalizations. At the limit of informational compressibility, the physical universe is actually a mathematical universe.
The real million dollar question is "can a convergent sequence of mathematical relations be described as an approach towards isomorphism, where theoretical constructs become MP , limits ?" Where M stands for mathematical description and P stands for physical existence. Does this limit exist? can it be proved to exist? Does quantum mechanics provide us with a reliable model for trans-Turing computation?
We realize now that the surface area of the horizon of a black hole is a measure of its entropy, so the maximum entropy of any closed region of space can never exceed one quarter of the area of the circumscribing surface:
S' = S_m + [1/4]A
According to Stephen Hawking, in the excellent book "The Universe in a Nutshell" , entropy is nothing more than a measure of the total information contained in a system, and the the information associated with all phenomena in the three dimensional world may be stored on its two-dimensional boundary, like a holographic image.
So space is a form of memory storage for the universe, hypothetically speaking of course.
The hypothesis is that since space encodes information, the entire universe is a gigantic computer which operates as a self referential logic loop that feeds back into itself.
Since spacetime is a form of memory storage, the universe "remembers" the information[person's life] . We are forever etched into the universal "storage disc = 3D space".
We are just sentient programs and the universal "mind", is computing and storing the information.
Truth is an algorithm.
™ Version 4.2