People, please read this... (re: Same sex mariage)

You referred to Blatant Latin homophobic mistranslations. I found none such. I referred to both the Masoretic and Septuagint to review the translations. They confirmed my beliefs.Only difference was that you then chose to deny 'man lies with mankind' was a direct homosexual reference. Instead the argument was 'there was no such thing as homosexuality back then'.Evidence you call it ?Lev 18-20 was specifically addressed to the people, not priests, yet you insists it wasn't.What is the point af discussing it with you ? See the thread starter. How many Christians on this site ? You'd think if I wanted to find a like minded audience I would go somewhere else huh ? Instead I argue against a lesbian , a bisexual and whatever Rrhain is.PS: When someone chooses to question even the most elementary facts , there is little point in continuing a discussion. Try the Christian understanding of Lev. I see no difference between the English translation of the Maseritic text and the English KJV or the English translation of the Septuagint.
They all say the same thing. This shows to me you haven't the first clue of Christianity. I've provided those already. Your choice was blatant denial.Shall, I'll spend yet another 2 hours wasting my time, trying to help you come to an understanding, when you will question even the most simplistic verses ?Or shall I just copy and paste a selection of quotes from you on this site in an attempt to view your bias ?Shall we try the latter ?"Historically some of the worst diseases in Western history (the major plagues) were exacerbated by Xtian ignorance regarding disease and how to treat it, thus hitting them much harder than they had to.""The deal is that our (by which I mean the western world's) current calender/dating system is based on Xtian mythology and while not intolerable to continue using, does seem somewhat clunky and pointless.""I do not view the Bible as the work of God. I view the Bible as the work of men. Much more than that, it seems that the disjointed and inconsistent passages are actually cobbled together "fables" and "myths" from earlier sources.""Become rambling? The Bible IS rambling. It looks suspiciously like other pieces of literature that are accumulations of many previous works patched together to look as if it is one story."**If you see the Bible as 'disjointed and inconsistent passages' why do you even waste people's time trying to discuss it ?Just forget about it, move on with your life and accept that other people might not have difficulty understanding it, thus they might have different opinions.However, trying to convince me that you're actually interested in coming to a truth regarding the text is futile. I see no point in wasting anymore time discussing Biblical text with you.

Do you actually think that no-one checks up what you post ?Indeed of chapters 21-27, only 2 refer to priests. Where do you pull this from ? Haha. The Bible expert. After all your previous posts, do you really think I'll be surprised at any of your assumptions favour an inaccurate / roman 'infested', mythical based bible Even dawn on you that failing religions would have to incorporate Biblical stories to maintain their following ... I guess not For someone that believes the Bible as trash, you sure spend alot of time reading up on it. Unfortunitely with your previous post , you demonstrated you just dont understand it. Make no mistake, you never will understand it, unless you ask God to explain it to you. Shall we hit close to home ? Proving the Bible wrong is the single most important thing to you. You know that should the Bible be true, you would indeed be considered a grave sinner. Called opportunity cost. Is it worth it to sacrifise your current lifestyle for a possibility of an afterlife in Heaven, or is your current lifestyle too important to you ?Your bias and Christian phobia is very apparent. Sorry to have to be the one to tell you that.

Be clear about your statements. Indeed make a point of noting that only 2 chapters are addressed to priests. They are indeed addressed to priests not regarding ritual sacrifise.They are laws for priests. Try read them.PS Chapter 21 ends with
24 And Moses told it unto Aaron, and to his sons, and unto all the children of Israel.Interesting. Think perhaps God could have lead the mans decisions via the Holy Spirit ? Afterall he was a man of faith And ? What is the historical accuracy of texts regarding these God's/Myths ? You accept their accuracy pretty quickly, but do you not assume they could have been edited to fit in with Christianity or dare I say, insinuate the religion was based on Pagan religions ?PS.. I know what you will believe.Just for interest sakes. If I write a book in 2003 about a Pagan religion about a man called Masus, which escaped from Egypt in 3000 BC, does also mean Christianity is crock ? I suggest you treat those fables with the same degree of criticism you regard the Bible with.. Read the opinions of famous Biblical Scholars and critics. I'll give you some if you really want. This why you hate Christianity ? Bad experience ? Without God you will not understand it. Like a 3d poster. You have to learn to squint properly before it makes sense. Sorry, but it works like that. Nope. Go back and find out why you hate Christianity. I'm sure you already know why. You need to clear your mind before you can rid yourself of bias. Haha, last you posted you agreed that the act of homosexual sex was sinfull, but that the bible mentioned nothing about the actuall lifestyle of homosexuality as being a sin.If you need me to explain to you why God cant bless a union based on a sinfull sex act, then you need to spend more time analysing the Bible. It will come to you eventually.Oh yeah, try reading Matthew also. Jesus mentions something about divorce and the Law, and how in the begining man was made for woman.PS: Regarding 'Judge not... etc' , I suggest you read 1 Corinthians again. These biblical paradoxes have a way of becoming clear the more you read and *pray* (sorry .. to see that 3D puzzle, you need to cross your eyes.)