Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Gradual cooling of the earth
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 2587
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 18 of 19 (654642)
03-02-2012 3:02 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by anglagard
03-02-2012 12:29 AM


Re: Hate to disagree but...
Anglagard writes:
A minor point in an otherwise largely accurate description.
Rahvin writes:
Most of the Earth is still molten, and it's far from homogenous.
Hate to disagree, but I suppose there is a first time for everything.
Most of the Earth is solid. The structure from top to bottom is crust, solid mantle, a plastic layer in the mantle around 20-50km down but only a few km thick. 1800 more miles of solid mantle, a liquid outer core and a solid inner core. The mantle makes up the majority of the Earth by both volume and mass and it is solid.
The issue of where is "half-way" down can be troublesome. Math states that the volume of a sphere is four thirds Pi R cubed. When you first gut-think half-way down, you are dividing the earth into roughly 1/8ths and 7/8ths. The volumetric half way point down into a sphere is about .79R (the cube root of .5) from the center.
The earth is some 6371 km in R, average radius, (or about 3960 miles). This means that half of the earth is only below about 816 miles, something akin to the trip from Detroit to New York, well above Anglagards 1800 mile thickness of the mantle.
"Most" can be an "optical illusion" of sorts when not thought out.

- xongsmith, 5.7d

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by anglagard, posted 03-02-2012 12:29 AM anglagard has not replied

  
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 2587
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 19 of 19 (654643)
03-02-2012 3:13 PM


BTW, with 7+ billion people on this earth, it may not seem that there is an immediate danger in using geothermal energy (ala' Iceland, let's say). Not now. But what if we find a great way to harness the molten interior for billions of years? When I first saw the OP title, I thought this was a long-range assessment of a potential new human-generated danger. Eventually, could humanity survive on a cold stone?
Oh well.

- xongsmith, 5.7d

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024