The Death Knell for ID?

They are a a fraud. The wiki article really shows what a fraud they are.
Bilogic InstituteI posted about it a while back.
Message 106

I will be surprised if we hear much more from amp. He has fulfilled his religious duty or fulfilled requirements for his christian school by coming here and posting crap.If he does return it will be to express his christian persecution complex.

I think amp is long gone.
All he did was reinforce our feelings about creos.

Your IDiocy is showing. Maybe some people will give you a pass because you seem to be Canadian. But if 5 secs on the intertubes can show how stupid this comment is I am not giving you a pass.U.S. District Courts are not local courts.

quote:

---

In the United States federal courts, the United States district courts are the general trial courts. The federal district courts have jurisdiction over federal questions (trials and cases interpreting federal law, or which involve federal statutes or crimes) and diversity (cases otherwise subject to jurisdiction in a state trial court but which are between litigants of different states and/or countries).

---

Source
You see how I did that? I did some research before I opened my yap and said something stupid. I have to laugh everytime someone hasn't a clue what they are talking about. How about you ID people show us some of this vaunted scientific research that is being done in the name of ID? How about pointing them out instead of just claiming they exist? Or can't you? Please present your argument on this or just shut up and quit wasting board space.You have done nothing but make attack and make assertions. How about making an argument? If you can't guhbye.District court - WikipediaABE
I see you edited your post but glad to see I got to it before you did. Not feeling confident in your assertions?Edited by Theodoric, : ID boy edited his post

Where are your examples/ Where is your evidence? You assert a lot of things but provide nothing.This is what we cal a Gish Gallop. How about you pick one or two things and actually present an argument instead of throwing crap against the wall to see what sticks. Ok. Discuss. What about the finches? Ok. Discuss. Sternberg was fired? That's news. Please show your source. Are you cut and pasting or are you so ignorant you don't even know how to spell his name or what the name of the journal is? Hint "Preceedings" is not in its name. Oh BTW that isn't even an English word.Lets start with those two. Ready. Set. Go.ABE I don't pander to liars aand spreaders of PRATTS.Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

Obviously you know nothing about US jurisprudence. The ignorance of this statement is astounding. Also obviously it meant alot. If you want to argue it meant nothing we can make this a third point and you could provide some sort of evidence, but you seem to just have assertions.Oh yeah
Welcome

We do not debate links here. Either put it in your own words or move along. Anyone can post links. If you cannot show an understanding of the subject matter move along.
EvC Forum: RulesLook at #5